数字时代的戏仿与版权合理使用制度的新发展
发布时间：2018-09-07 09:13
【摘要】：戏仿是版权保护的重要文艺批评形式。数字时代,对已有版权作品进行再诠释和混搭创作成为文学艺术的主要表达之一,而合理使用是版权法中唯一使这种表达形式合法化的规则通道。美国司法实践表明,戏仿构成合理使用的条件进一步降低;英国也于2014年在修订版权法合理使用制度时增加"戏仿"一条。虽然目前中国在此方面缺乏司法实践,但是西方国家在戏仿理论与实践方面的经验值得借鉴。在承认戏仿作为一种艺术形式值得版权保护的基础上,将可得到版权保护的戏仿限定在对原作或其他作品进行批评或评论的范围内,并要求原作作者在作者权方面做出一定的让步。
[Abstract]:Parody is an important form of literary and art criticism for copyright protection. In the digital age, reinterpretation of existing copyrighted works and mixed creation has become one of the main expressions of literature and art, and rational use is the only regular channel in copyright law to legalize this form of expression. Judicial practice in the United States has shown that parody constitutes a further reduction in the conditions for rational use, and the United Kingdom added a parody in 2014 when revising the fair use system of copyright law. Although there is a lack of judicial practice in China at present, the experience of western countries in parody theory and practice is worthy of reference. Recognizing that parody is worthy of copyright protection as an artistic form, limiting copyrighted parody to criticism or comment on the original or other works, And ask the original author to make certain concessions in the author's rights.
【作者单位】： 西北大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.41
本文编号：2227830
[Abstract]:Parody is an important form of literary and art criticism for copyright protection. In the digital age, reinterpretation of existing copyrighted works and mixed creation has become one of the main expressions of literature and art, and rational use is the only regular channel in copyright law to legalize this form of expression. Judicial practice in the United States has shown that parody constitutes a further reduction in the conditions for rational use, and the United Kingdom added a parody in 2014 when revising the fair use system of copyright law. Although there is a lack of judicial practice in China at present, the experience of western countries in parody theory and practice is worthy of reference. Recognizing that parody is worthy of copyright protection as an artistic form, limiting copyrighted parody to criticism or comment on the original or other works, And ask the original author to make certain concessions in the author's rights.
【作者单位】： 西北大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.41
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 甘明;;论“戏仿”作品的知识产权保护——以《一个馒头引发的血案》为视角[J];图书馆建设;2007年05期
2 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 曹燕飞;;戏仿合法性之讨论——以利益衡量为工具[A];当代法学论坛（二○○九年第2辑）[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 本报记者 汪闽燕 本报实习生 高笛;港将修法确定“戏仿”作品是否侵权[N];法制日报;2013年
2 陈玫莹;戏仿自由岂能游走在版权的边缘[N];中国知识产权报;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 傅洋;戏仿、改编侵害保护作品完整权的相关法律问题研究[D];沈阳师范大学;2016年
2 陈凌浩;戏仿作品的保护与限制[D];暨南大学;2013年
3 李淇瑾;论戏仿作品的著作权法规制[D];广西师范大学;2014年
4 鲍陶然;戏仿作品的合法性研究[D];华中科技大学;2010年
5 王丽丽;著作权视野中的戏仿问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2007年
，本文编号：2227830
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2227830.html
