专利侵权诉讼中权利要求解释研究
发布时间：2018-09-14 12:30
【摘要】：专利制度是近代法律制度中创设的一项重要成果,以“为天才之火添加利益之油”的方式推动技术革新,并已成为当今社会重要的产权制度。专利制度被学者称为“权利要求的游戏”,权利要求在专利法中的重要地位由此可见一斑。然而,由于语言文字含义的模糊性、滞后性,专利权利要求书撰写要求的缺陷以及不同主体对权利要求的不同理解,专利权的保护范围也变得模糊、不易确定。因此,有必要采用一定的方法对专利权利要求进行解释,以明确专利权的保护范围。为此,各国在司法实践中不断创设新的解释规则和方法,这些规则和方法的适用使得专利制度从整体上呈现出一种强调明确专利权保护范围的趋势。本文首先对专利权利要求解释的概念、必要性与特殊性进行了阐述,并对目前专利权利要求解释的核心理念、原则和方法加以梳理;然后,结合我国现阶段法院在司法实践中针对相关问题的观点,探究目前专利侵权诉讼中法院创设的新的裁判规则和方法,及目前法院对专利权利要求解释的整体趋势;最后,对专利侵权诉讼中权利要求解释的发展趋势进行简要分析,并针对不足之处提出部分粗浅的完善意见。
[Abstract]:Patent system is an important achievement created in the modern legal system. It has become an important property right system in today's society by "adding the oil of benefit for the fire of genius" to promote technological innovation. The patent system is called "the game of claims" by scholars, and the important position of claims in patent law can be seen. However, due to the fuzziness and lag of the meaning of language and characters, the defects of the writing requirements of patent claims and the different understanding of claims by different subjects, the scope of patent protection becomes vague and difficult to determine. Therefore, it is necessary to use certain methods to explain patent claims in order to clarify the scope of patent protection. Therefore, many countries have created new interpretation rules and methods in judicial practice. The application of these rules and methods makes the patent system show a trend of emphasizing the scope of patent protection. This paper firstly expounds the concept, necessity and particularity of patent claim interpretation, and combs the core idea, principle and method of patent claim interpretation at present. Combined with the current judicial practice of our court in view of the relevant issues, explore the current patent infringement court in the creation of new rules and methods of adjudication, and the current court of patent claims interpretation of the overall trend; finally, This paper briefly analyzes the development trend of the interpretation of claims in patent infringement litigation, and puts forward some superficial suggestions for the defects.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.42
本文编号：2242716
[Abstract]:Patent system is an important achievement created in the modern legal system. It has become an important property right system in today's society by "adding the oil of benefit for the fire of genius" to promote technological innovation. The patent system is called "the game of claims" by scholars, and the important position of claims in patent law can be seen. However, due to the fuzziness and lag of the meaning of language and characters, the defects of the writing requirements of patent claims and the different understanding of claims by different subjects, the scope of patent protection becomes vague and difficult to determine. Therefore, it is necessary to use certain methods to explain patent claims in order to clarify the scope of patent protection. Therefore, many countries have created new interpretation rules and methods in judicial practice. The application of these rules and methods makes the patent system show a trend of emphasizing the scope of patent protection. This paper firstly expounds the concept, necessity and particularity of patent claim interpretation, and combs the core idea, principle and method of patent claim interpretation at present. Combined with the current judicial practice of our court in view of the relevant issues, explore the current patent infringement court in the creation of new rules and methods of adjudication, and the current court of patent claims interpretation of the overall trend; finally, This paper briefly analyzes the development trend of the interpretation of claims in patent infringement litigation, and puts forward some superficial suggestions for the defects.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.42
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 王忠敏;;发明和实用新型专利权利要求解释原则初探[J];常熟理工学院学报;2009年11期
2 王阜东;;美国法院专利权利要求解释及侵权判定处理实例分析[J];中国发明与专利;2009年06期
3 唐田田;;美国专利法判例选析 功能性权利要求的认定标准和内部证据在侵权判定中的处理原则[J];中国发明与专利;2009年10期
4 毛映红;;小议“方法限定产品”专利权利要求的解释方法——从美国CAFC大法庭最新判决谈起[J];知识产权;2009年06期
，本文编号：2242716
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2242716.html
