涉及计算机程序的发明专利创造性研究
发布时间：2018-11-20 13:53
【摘要】：本文研究涉及计算机程序的发明专利(简称计算机程序专利)的创造性问题。自计算机程序产生以来,人们就一直在积极探索对其最佳的法律手段,而专利保护正是其中可行性比较高的一种。要想采用专利法来对计算机程序进行保护,第一个必须解决的是专利客体的问题,第二个必须解决的是专利三性问题。当前很多国家在理论和实践中均承认了计算机程序的专利保护,并规定了哪些计算机程序才属于专利保护的客体;并且在一些专利制度比较完善的国家或地区还针对计算机程序专利的特殊性做出了一些特别的规定,分别制订了符合本国实际情况的特别标准来对计算机程序专利的创造性进行审查。我国目前还没有制订单独适用于计算机程序专利的创造性判断标准,适用普适性标准来对计算机程序专利进行创造性审查,但是由于计算机程序专利的特殊性导致了不少问题的出现,没有真正起到通过专利制度促进计算机行业发展的目的。基于此,笔者研究了美国、欧洲以及日本等国计算机程序专利的创造性判断标准,结合计算机程序自身的特点,指出尽早建立符合我国国情的计算机程序专利创造性判断标准的必要性,同时指出在建立计算机程序专利创造性判断标准时需要注意如下几个问题:找准最接近的现有技术、从整体上把握计算机程序专利以及谨慎使用公知常识。笔者希望我国能够借鉴欧美等国的经验,尽快建立计算机程序专利创造性判断标准,并适当降低计算机程序专利的创造性要求,以便能够为计算机程序行业的迅速发展提供更强有力的法律保障。
[Abstract]:This paper deals with the creativity of invention patents involving computer programs. Since the emergence of computer programs, people have been actively exploring the best legal means, and patent protection is one of the most feasible. In order to protect computer programs by patent law, the first problem must be solved by patent object, and the second is the third problem of patent. At present, many countries recognize the patent protection of computer program in theory and practice, and stipulate which computer program belongs to the object of patent protection. And in some countries or regions where the patent system is relatively perfect, some special provisions have been made for the particularity of computer program patents. Special standards have been developed to examine the creativity of computer program patents in accordance with the actual situation in the country. At present, our country has not formulated the creative judgment standard which is suitable for computer program patent separately, and applies the universal standard to carry on the creative examination to the computer program patent. However, because of the particularity of computer program patent, many problems have appeared, and the purpose of promoting the development of computer industry through patent system has not really been achieved. Based on this, the author studies the creative judgment criteria of computer program patents in the United States, Europe and Japan, and combines the characteristics of computer programs. It is pointed out that it is necessary to establish as soon as possible the criteria for judging the creativity of computer program patents in accordance with the national conditions of our country. At the same time, we should pay attention to the following problems when establishing the criteria for judging the creativity of computer program patents: to find the closest existing technologies, Master computer program patents as a whole and use common knowledge with caution. The author hopes that China can draw lessons from the experience of Europe and the United States, establish the criteria for judging the creativity of computer program patents as soon as possible, and appropriately reduce the creative requirements of computer program patents. In order to provide a stronger legal guarantee for the rapid development of the computer program industry.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.42
本文编号：2345092
[Abstract]:This paper deals with the creativity of invention patents involving computer programs. Since the emergence of computer programs, people have been actively exploring the best legal means, and patent protection is one of the most feasible. In order to protect computer programs by patent law, the first problem must be solved by patent object, and the second is the third problem of patent. At present, many countries recognize the patent protection of computer program in theory and practice, and stipulate which computer program belongs to the object of patent protection. And in some countries or regions where the patent system is relatively perfect, some special provisions have been made for the particularity of computer program patents. Special standards have been developed to examine the creativity of computer program patents in accordance with the actual situation in the country. At present, our country has not formulated the creative judgment standard which is suitable for computer program patent separately, and applies the universal standard to carry on the creative examination to the computer program patent. However, because of the particularity of computer program patent, many problems have appeared, and the purpose of promoting the development of computer industry through patent system has not really been achieved. Based on this, the author studies the creative judgment criteria of computer program patents in the United States, Europe and Japan, and combines the characteristics of computer programs. It is pointed out that it is necessary to establish as soon as possible the criteria for judging the creativity of computer program patents in accordance with the national conditions of our country. At the same time, we should pay attention to the following problems when establishing the criteria for judging the creativity of computer program patents: to find the closest existing technologies, Master computer program patents as a whole and use common knowledge with caution. The author hopes that China can draw lessons from the experience of Europe and the United States, establish the criteria for judging the creativity of computer program patents as soon as possible, and appropriately reduce the creative requirements of computer program patents. In order to provide a stronger legal guarantee for the rapid development of the computer program industry.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.42
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 赵俊林;计算机软件法律保护模式研究[J];当代法学;2003年04期
2 崔国斌;"文字作品"的专利法保护 计算机程序文本的可专利性分析[J];法律适用;2005年09期
3 吴晓达;;计算机软件专利保护在中国的现状及展望[J];中国发明与专利;2007年03期
4 李温;也论保护计算机软件的法律模式及其选择[J];法学评论;2002年04期
5 张玲;朱长宝;;计算机软件的可专利性及其保护[J];计算机时代;2006年10期
6 杨佳;武夷山;;美国软件专利制度发展脉络的研究[J];科技管理研究;2006年09期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 黄震;计算机软件专利的实质条件研究[D];西南政法大学;2007年
，本文编号：2345092
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2345092.html
