从《消费者权益保护法》之保护范围论金融消费者之适用及相关问题
发布时间:2018-11-20 15:26
【摘要】:本文在界定消费者权益保护法第二条保障之主体、行为及目的范围的基础上,进而从法的解释论出发,界定了金融交易争议之适用范围,分析了金融消费者适用于消费者权益保护法可能产生的相关问题。指出,金融消费是否属于"为生活需要而消费"易生争执;保护主体仅及于自然人不及于非专业投资机构之一般法人,恐生保护不足之弊;金融商品本质上属于无实体之权利,可能造成法规适用之b^格;欠缺完整的争讼途径。
[Abstract]:On the basis of defining the subject, behavior and scope of the purpose of the second article of the Consumer Rights and interests Protection Law, this paper defines the scope of application of the financial transaction dispute from the interpretation theory of the law. This paper analyzes the related problems that may arise when financial consumers apply to consumer rights and interests protection law. It is pointed out that whether financial consumption belongs to "consumption for the purpose of life" is susceptible to disputes, the main body of protection is not as good as the general legal person of the non-professional investment organization, and the harm of insufficient protection is feared. Financial commodities are essentially non-entity rights, which may lead to the application of laws and regulations; lack of a complete way of litigation.
【作者单位】: 清华大学商法学博士班;
【分类号】:D923.8
[Abstract]:On the basis of defining the subject, behavior and scope of the purpose of the second article of the Consumer Rights and interests Protection Law, this paper defines the scope of application of the financial transaction dispute from the interpretation theory of the law. This paper analyzes the related problems that may arise when financial consumers apply to consumer rights and interests protection law. It is pointed out that whether financial consumption belongs to "consumption for the purpose of life" is susceptible to disputes, the main body of protection is not as good as the general legal person of the non-professional investment organization, and the harm of insufficient protection is feared. Financial commodities are essentially non-entity rights, which may lead to the application of laws and regulations; lack of a complete way of litigation.
【作者单位】: 清华大学商法学博士班;
【分类号】:D923.8
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 魏琼;赖元超;;论我国金融消费者的概念及其特权[J];金融理论与实践;2011年07期
2 王振栋;;论金融消费者与投资者的识别标准[J];上海金融;2011年06期
3 陈洁;;投资者到金融消费者的角色嬗变[J];法学研究;2011年05期
4 张彬;;浅谈如何保护金融消费者的合法权益[J];时代金融;2012年02期
5 梁彦红;;金融消费者法律问题探析[J];科技与企业;2012年06期
6 庄园;沈芬梅;;金融消费者特殊权利保护的途径[J];商品与质量;2012年S4期
7 顾肖荣;陈玲;;试论金融消费者保护标准和程序的基本法律问题[J];政治与法律;2012年06期
8 张粲粲;;我国金融消费者的概念与法律保护[J];知识经济;2012年10期
9 李雪静;;基于法学视角浅析金融消费者概念[J];金融理论与实践;2012年09期
10 黎金荣;;后危机时代金融消费者与投资者的法律界定[J];西南金融;2012年12期
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 记者 顾晓红;保护金融消费者 权益是永恒主题[N];联合时报;2013年
2 金时;应建立独立的金融消费者投诉机制[N];证券日报;2011年
3 本报记者 王晓雁;建监管协调机制保护金融消费者[N];法制日报;2013年
4 记者 沈,
本文编号:2345268
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2345268.html