社交媒体下的个人隐私保护研究

发布时间：2019-01-20 08:22

【摘要】：互联网服务的普及彻底的改变了人们获取信息的方式,社交媒体的兴起则彻底的改变了信息传播的方式,人们不再仅仅是接收和传播信息的一个节点,而成为了一个可以产生信息的自媒体。社交媒体除具有web2.0技术带来的基本特性,还兼具了社交性和媒体性,使其下的个人隐私和隐私权都扩展出新的内涵。同时,在社交媒体带来的冲击下,处于科技发展、大众传媒、公权力膨胀以及消费主义文化等多重现代困境中的隐私权益问题进一步凸显,如何应对新形势下的网络隐私侵权问题成为一个全世界共同关注的问题。作为隐私权概念的发源地,欧美发达国家的隐私保护意识一直走在前列,相关法律体系也更成熟和完善,形成了以美国和欧盟为代表的两大隐私保护模式,即法律规制主导模式和行业自律主导保护模式。两大模式经过长期的碰撞、交流和发展,达成了具有重要意义的“安全港模式”。而我国由于特定的历史文化原因和法制发展进程,隐私保护意识和相关法律法规都比较滞后,许多问题亟待解决,如隐私权无独立人格权地位,隐私保护的法律法规缺失,行业自律状况滞后等,使得社交媒体下的个人隐私保护面临着巨大的挑战。处于网络环境中的社交媒体下的隐私权具有不同于传统隐私权的诸多特点,出现了许多新的客体和侵害方式,给隐私权保护带来了巨大的挑战。然而,社交媒体下的隐私作为隐私在网络领域的拓展,对它的保护仍要从整体隐私保护模式的构建和完善入手。本文在对社交媒体,隐私权背景信息详述分析的基础上,通过介绍、分析、对比美国和欧盟地区隐私保护模式,结合我国隐私保护现状、存在的问题以及互联网行业发展状况,提出适合我国隐私保护模式,即以立法规制为主、行业自律为辅的隐私保护模式。最后在选定模式的基础上,提出以立法建议为主的对策性意见,以实现对社交媒体下个人隐私权益的充分保护,促进信息社会在网络时代稳定而健康的发展。
[Abstract]:The popularity of Internet services has completely changed the way people access information, the rise of social media has completely changed the way information is spread, people are no longer just a node to receive and disseminate information. And become a self-media that can produce information. Social media not only has the basic characteristics of web2.0 technology, but also has the social and media nature, which makes the privacy and privacy under the social media expand the new connotation. At the same time, in the impact of social media, in the development of science and technology, mass media, the expansion of public power and consumerism culture and other multiple modern dilemmas of privacy rights and interests further highlighted. How to deal with network privacy infringement has become a common concern in the world. As the birthplace of the concept of privacy, the developed countries in Europe and the United States have always been in the forefront of privacy protection awareness, and the relevant legal system has become more mature and improved, forming two privacy protection models represented by the United States and the European Union. Namely legal regulation leading mode and industry self-discipline leading protection mode. After long-term collision, communication and development, the two models have reached a significant "safe harbour model". However, due to specific historical and cultural reasons and legal development process, privacy protection consciousness and related laws and regulations are lagging behind. Many problems need to be solved, such as the lack of independent personality status of privacy, the absence of privacy protection laws and regulations. Industry self-discipline lags behind, which makes privacy protection under social media face great challenges. The privacy of social media in the network environment has many characteristics different from the traditional privacy, and many new objects and infringing ways appear, which brings great challenges to the protection of privacy. However, the privacy of social media as the expansion of privacy in the field of the network, the protection of its still from the overall model of privacy protection construction and improvement. Based on the detailed analysis of the background information of social media and privacy, this paper compares the privacy protection models of the United States and the European Union with the current situation of privacy protection in China, the existing problems and the development situation of the Internet industry through the introduction, analysis, and comparison of the privacy protection models in the United States and the European Union. This paper proposes a privacy protection model suitable for our country, that is, the privacy protection model, which is mainly regulated by legislation and supplemented by industry self-discipline. Finally, on the basis of the selected model, the author puts forward some suggestions based on the legislative suggestions in order to fully protect the privacy rights of individuals under social media, and to promote the steady and healthy development of the information society in the network age.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】