当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 商法论文 >

论法院地法在涉外物权中的适用

发布时间:2018-02-27 05:20

  本文关键词: 法院地法 涉外物权 法律适用 物之所在地法 出处:《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:涉外物权的法律适用,自古以来都是学者们关注的焦点。但从14世纪萨维尼提出有关涉外物权的冲突规范至今,无论是理论学说还是立法实践都很少有人直接提出适用法院地法的主张。这并不意味着我们能忽视这种实际存在的现象。如果仔细分析便知,在涉外物权的法律适用中,虽没有直接适用法院地法的相关规定,它却总是能够获得适用。沈涓教授把这一现象称之为:法院地法在物权关系中的隐性适用。本文在整理各方面资料的基础上,分析法院地法在涉外物权关系中的适用情况,归纳其适用的原因,,总结其发展趋势,最后结合我国相关法律对法院地法在我国涉外物权领域的适用情况进行分析,找出存在的问题并提出解决思路。 文章分为四个部分,合计三万余字。 第一部分是分析法院地法与涉外物权的法律适用。本部分分别从法院地法与不动产物权的法律适用、法院地法与动产物权的法律适用两个方面来进行分析。对于不动产物权的法律适用,从“物之所在地法”提出至今,似乎并没有什么太大改变。法院地法看似与不动产物权的法律适用并没有太大关系,但由于法律选择规则和管辖权选择规则的的双重作用,使得法院地法往往能够得到隐性适用。相比较不动产,动产物权的法律适用就要复杂的多。本文将动产分为了一般动产和特殊动产两类,分别对它们的法律适用情况进行分析。与不动产相同的是,这一部分也是从法律选择规则和管辖权选择规则的双重作用下来分析法院地法在动产物权中的适用情况。 第二部分是法院地法在涉外物权中适用的归因。法院地法能够在涉外物权中得到适用,除了第一部分所提到的冲突规范和管辖权规则的双重作用之外,还体现在物本身的特殊性还有国家主权利益的驱使。而法院地法的救济作用也是我们不能忽视的因素。 第三部分是法院地法在涉外物权领域的发展趋势。时代发展,社会进步,旧有的观点和理论也在不断的推陈出新。涉外物权领域中物之所在地法原则的松动、“分割法”的采用,以及最密切联系原则和意思自治原则的引入,都对物权的法律适用问题带来了很大的影响。甚至还包括法院地法的发展趋势。这些变化都影响着法院地法在涉外物权中的适用情况。通过分析,其发展趋势也就不言而喻了。 第四部分是法院地法在我国涉外物权领域适用的分析及反思。本部分从《中华人民共和国涉外关系法律适用法》出发,结合《民法通则》、《物权法》、《民事诉讼法》、《海商法》等相关法律,对法院地法在我国涉外物权领域中的适用情况进行分析,并且指出这种现象的不合理之处以及在今后的立法中该如何做。
[Abstract]:The application of foreign real right law has been the focus of scholars' attention since ancient times. But since 14th century Savini put forward the conflict norm concerning foreign real right. No matter in theory or in legislative practice, few people put forward the idea of applying the law of the forum directly. This does not mean that we can ignore the actual existence of this phenomenon. If we analyze it carefully, we can see that in the application of the law concerning foreign real right, Although there is no direct application of the relevant provisions of the law of the forum, it can always be applied. Professor Shen Quan calls this phenomenon the implicit application of the law of the forum in the real right relationship. This paper analyzes the application of the forum law in the foreign real right relationship, sums up the reasons for its application, summarizes its development trend, and finally analyzes the application of the forum law in the field of foreign real right in our country in combination with the relevant laws of our country. Find out the existing problems and put forward solutions. The article is divided into four parts, totaling more than 30,000 words. The first part is to analyze the application of the law of the forum law and the real right concerning foreign affairs. This paper analyzes the application of the law of the forum and the real property right of movable property from the point of view of "the law of the place of the property", so far as the application of the law of the real property right is concerned. It seems that nothing has changed much. The law of the forum does not seem to have much to do with the application of the law of real property, but because of the dual role of the rules of choice of law and the rules of choice of jurisdiction, Compared with immovable property, the legal application of movable property is much more complicated. In this paper, chattel is divided into two types: general movable property and special movable property. This part also analyzes the application of forum law in movable property right from the dual function of the rules of choice of law and the rule of choice of jurisdiction. The second part is the attribution of the application of the forum law in the foreign real right. The forum law can be applied in the foreign real right, except for the dual function of the conflict norm and the jurisdiction rule mentioned in the first part. It is also reflected in the particularity of the material itself and the drive of the sovereign interests of the state, and the relief function of the law of the forum is also a factor that we can not ignore. The third part is the development trend of the forum law in the field of foreign real right. The old views and theories are constantly emerging from the past. The loosening of the principle of location law in the field of foreign real rights, the adoption of the "division method," and the introduction of the principle of the closest connection and the principle of autonomy of will, Both of them have a great influence on the application of the law of real right. Even the development trend of the law of the forum is also included. These changes affect the application of the law of the forum in the real right involving foreign affairs. Through the analysis, the development trend of the law is self-evident. Part 4th is the analysis and reflection of the application of the forum law in the field of foreign real right in China. This part starts from the Law of the people's Republic of China on the Application of the Law concerning Foreign Relations. Combined with the relevant laws such as General principles of Civil Law, Real right Law, Civil procedure Law and Maritime Law, this paper analyzes the application of the forum law in the field of foreign real right in China. It also points out the unreasonableness of this phenomenon and how to do it in the future legislation.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D997.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 屈广清,周后春;论物权法律适用的分割制[J];大连海事大学学报(社会科学版);2004年01期

2 陈卫佐;;日本国际私法的最新改革[J];法律适用;2009年02期

3 陈卫佐;;涉外民事关系法律适用法的中国特色[J];法律适用;2011年11期

4 孙建;;论我国国际私法法律适用的确定性与灵活性[J];法学评论;2012年02期

5 杜焕芳;;论我国涉外物权法律适用的完善[J];当代法学;2013年02期

6 周后春;;当代物权冲突法之新发展[J];河北法学;2012年05期

7 周后春;;论物权法的任意性及其对物权法律适用的影响[J];湖南公安高等专科学校学报;2006年03期

8 吕岩峰;;物权法律冲突与物之所在地法原则的适用[J];河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年04期

9 吕岩峰;;论国际物权关系的适当法——物之所在地法原则之理析[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;2007年01期

10 颜宏辉;;国际私法适用与限制外国法的本位论[J];河南科技大学学报(社会科学版);2008年04期



本文编号:1541336

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/1541336.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e26d4***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com