《鹿特丹规则》下的无单放货责任制度

发布时间：2018-03-10 18:39

本文选题：提单　切入点：无单放货　出处：《华侨大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在海上货物运输法律制度中,凭正本提单放货是长期以来人们恪守的规则,然而随着海上贸易与运输的发展,这一做法在理论与实践上出现了某种程度上的冲突。《鹿特丹规则》试图通过构建新的无单放货责任体系制度,使部分无单放货行为有条件地合法化,来解决长期以来困扰着各方的难题。然而新框架下的无单放货责任体系制度虽有其优越性,亦存在不足之处。本文试图通过探析这一新制度的利弊,思考其对我国修改《海商法》可能带来的启示,提出相关建议与对策。文章先介绍了《鹿特丹规则》构建新的无单放货责任体系之缘由,介绍这一现象之理论基础,从其概念及形式入手,进而揭示该现象的危害性,通过针对无单放货责任制度的立法及实践现状的介绍,阐明这一新制度制定的必要性;接着重点介绍新公约对无单放货责任制度是如何进行重构的;之后作者对《鹿特丹规则》下无单放货责任制度的利弊进行权衡,分析其创新与值得借鉴之处,探究其不足之处,思考其可能为海上货物贸易与运输带来的负面影响;最后,讨论《鹿特丹规则》下的无单放货责任制度给我们带来的启示,分析我国应当如何在即将修订的《海商法》中对其加以参考借鉴。本文拟采用语义分析、逻辑分析、比较分析、历史分析、价值分析、实证分析等方法进行研究。论文的特色之处在于结合国内外对无单放货问题的判例和规定,从正反两方面对《鹿特丹规则》中无单放货责任制度的有关实体规定加以评析,探讨如何把握住即将进行的中国《海商法》修改之时运,对无单放货问题进行规制以适应国际运输法律的新发展,经过分析研究,认为中国应当借鉴新公约中的无单放货制度,但需要对其中相关内容加以调整和完善,以提高规则的操作可能性,适应我国的海商法实践。
[Abstract]:In the legal system of carriage of goods by sea, the delivery of goods by original bill of lading has long been the rule that people have adhered to for a long time. However, with the development of maritime trade and transportation, The Rotterdam rules try to establish a new system of liability for the delivery of goods without bill of lading to legalize part of the act of delivery without bill of lading in a conditional way. However, the system of no-bill delivery liability system under the new framework has its advantages and disadvantages. This paper attempts to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the new system. The article first introduces the reason why the Rotterdam rule constructs a new liability system for shipping goods without bill, and introduces the theoretical basis of this phenomenon. Starting with its concept and form, this paper reveals the harmfulness of this phenomenon, and clarifies the necessity of this new system by introducing the legislation and practice of the system. Then it introduces how the new convention reconstructs the liability system of non-bill delivery, and then the author weigh the advantages and disadvantages of the liability system under the Rotterdam rules, analyze its innovation and worthy of reference, and explore its shortcomings. Consider its possible negative impact on the trade and transport of goods by sea. Finally, discuss the implications of the liability system for non-documentary delivery under the Rotterdam rules. This paper intends to use semantic analysis, logic analysis, comparative analysis, historical analysis, value analysis, etc. The characteristics of this paper are that, in combination with the domestic and foreign cases and regulations on the issue of non-bill delivery, the relevant substantive provisions of the liability system of non-bill delivery in the Rotterdam rules are evaluated from both positive and negative aspects. This paper discusses how to grasp the timing of the upcoming revision of China's Maritime Law, and how to regulate the issue of undocumented delivery in order to adapt to the new development of international transport law. After an analysis and study, it is considered that China should draw lessons from the undocumented delivery system in the new convention. However, it is necessary to adjust and perfect the relevant contents in order to improve the operational possibility of the rules and adapt to the practice of maritime law in our country.
【学位授予单位】：华侨大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D996.19

【相似文献】