强制股权转让制度研究
发布时间:2018-03-13 19:30
本文选题:有限责任公司 切入点:公司僵局 出处:《湖南师范大学》2010年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:本文的研究内容是司法介入公司僵局途径之一的强制股权转让制度。伴随市场经济体制改革的不断推进,公司内部治理面临日益复杂和多元化的矛盾和冲突,公司僵局就是这一系列矛盾和冲突的集中表现形式。有限责任公司由于其“人合性”和“资合性”的双重特点更容易滋生和爆发公司僵局,这也是封闭式公司在全世界范围内面临的共同难题。公司僵局的危害是显而易见的。它使公司的内部治理陷入僵持状态,公司的正常运营停滞,股东的合法权益无从保障,与公司相关的利害关系人面临利益损失的重大风险,因此,寻求破解公司僵局成为商法领域一个重大而又现实的命题。我国2005年修订的《公司法》针对公司僵局问题进行了初步的救济制度设计,应该在一些方面有了实质性的突破,但是在完备程度和操作性层面处于起步阶段,面对纷繁复杂的现实情况缺乏有效的调整和明确的指引,公司僵局问题在目前的立法背景下仍然得不到全面的调整和明确的指引,相关问题的研究道路依然任重道远。 这几年来,针对公司僵局问题的研究和探讨十分活跃,但基本聚焦于司法强制解散制度上,对其他救济途径仅有点到为止的分析探讨。本文拟就强制股权转让制度为研究对象,借鉴国内外一系列成熟的法律成果,期望能够对公司僵局的解决提供一种可行的思路。 本文主体内容分为四个部分,首先是引言,案例引入。通过引入典型性案例指明目前我国公司法针对公司僵局问题所存在的法律漏洞,并参照国外经典案例提出引入强制股权转让制度的可行性和必要性。 第一部分,股权强制转让制度的法律概述。这一部分着眼于强制股权转让制度的基本问题,包括强制股权转让制度的定义、法律性质和法理基础,通过对这些基本问题的阐释确立强制股权转让制度的基本理论框架,并为下一部分的探讨奠定基础。 第二部分,强制股权转让制度的域外立法。这一部分主要是介绍美国和德国在强制股权转让制度方面的立法情况,阐明强制股权转让制度的现实基础和制度价值。 第三部分,强制股权转让制度的本土化构建。这一部分是文章的主体部分,通过对强制股权转让制度的法律构成要件的分析——包括适用范围、适用主体、运行程序、股权价格确定以及制度失效和豁免情况——为我国创设强制股权转让制度构建起基本的理论架构,这也是理论探讨服务于现实实践的必然要求。 第四部分,强制股权转让制度与公司法相关制度的衔接。在上一章节分析的基础上,这一部分主要是分析探讨强制股权转让制度与相关制度的法律界限和紧密联系,包括司法解散制度、异议股东股权收买请求权制度、公司债权人保护制度、股东人数制度以及资本维持制度。通过这部分的阐释,力求在理论层面和操作层面将强制股权转让制度融入现行公司法的法律体系。
[Abstract]:The research content of this paper is one of the compulsory equity of judicial intervention in corporation deadlock way transfer system. Along with the market economy system reform, corporate governance is facing increasingly complex and diverse contradictions and conflicts, concentrated form of company deadlock is a series of contradictions and conflicts. The limited liability company due to its dual characteristics of "people together" and "capital" is more likely to breed and the outbreak of the company deadlock, which is a common problem facing the company closed type in the world. The harm of corporate deadlock. It is obviously that the internal governance of the company into a stalemate, the normal operation of the company stagnation, the legitimate rights and interests of shareholders can not guarantee parties the relationship between corporation and the serious risks facing the loss of interest, therefore, to seek the company deadlock has become a major commercial law and realistic topic. I < > in 2005 revised company law relief system preliminary design for company deadlock problem, there should be a substantial breakthrough in some aspects, but in the complete degree and the operational level in the initial stage, facing the reality of the complexity of the lack of effective adjustment and clear guidelines, the corporate deadlock in the legislative background the present is still not fully adjusted and clear guidelines on issues related to the road is still a long way to go.
In recent years, the research on the corporate deadlock and discussion is very active, but the basic focus on the judicial dissolution system, on the other remedies only go beyond the analysis. This paper intends to compulsory equity transfer system as the research object, using a series of domestic and foreign mature legal results, expect to be able to solve the deadlock of the company to provide a feasible way.
The main content of this paper is divided into four parts, the first part is introduction, introducing the case. By introducing the typical case that China's company law for corporation deadlock exist loopholes in the law, and put forward the feasibility and necessity of the introduction of compulsory equity transfer system according to the classic case abroad.
The first part, overview of the law compulsory equity transfer system. This part focuses on the basic problems of compulsory equity transfer system, including the definition of compulsory equity transfer system, the legal nature and legal basis, establish the basic theoretical framework of compulsory equity transfer system based on the fundamental issues of interpretation, and lays the foundation for the next part of.
The second part is the extraterritorial legislation of the mandatory share transfer system. This part mainly introduces the legislative situation of the US and Germany in the compulsory equity transfer system, and expounds the realistic basis and institutional value of the mandatory share transfer system.
The third part, establishing compulsory equity transfer system localization. This part is the main part of the article, including the scope of application, through the analysis of the transfer of compulsory equity system of the legal elements of the subject, operation procedures, failure and equity price to determine the system and exemptions for the creation of China's compulsory equity transfer system construction theory the basic structure, which is the inevitable requirement of the practice of the theory of service.
The fourth part, cohesion compulsory equity transfer system related to the company law system. Based on the analysis on the section, this part mainly analyzes the legal limits of compulsory equity transfer system and other related systems and closely related, including the system of judicial dissolution, the dissenting shareholders' equity repurchase right system of company creditor protection system of shareholders. The number of the system and the capital maintenance system. Through this part of the explanation, in the theoretical level and operational level will force the equity transfer system into the existing company law legal system.
【学位授予单位】:湖南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 鲍为民;美国法上的公司僵局处理制度及其启示[J];法商研究;2005年03期
2 陈开梓;;公司僵局的预防及法律救济[J];广西社会科学;2007年09期
,本文编号:1607847
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/1607847.html