海上货物运输实际承运人概念和责任辨析

发布时间：2018-04-30 08:01

本文选题：实际承运人概念 + 责任　；参考：《大连海事大学》2001年硕士论文

【摘要】： 《海商法》效仿《汉堡规则》的有关条款，引进了实际承运人概念，从而解决了对货物进行实际运输者的权利、义务和责任问题，为货方就货物灭失和损坏进行索赔增加了一条救济途径。但该法中的有关实际承运人的法律规范立法技术欠周，存在着缺陷和漏洞，为学习和掌握该法律规范带来了困难，也为在司法实践中正确识别实际承运人和追究其法律责任增加了难度。本文通过对实际承运人这一制度的渊源的考察，探究了该制度得以建立的原因及立法本意，然后用法律阐释的原则和方法，对该法就实际承运人定义和责任所做的规范进行了剖析。本文认为，对实际承运人定义中的“委托”、“从事货物运输”等词语，应进行扩张解释，以扩大实际承运人的范围；对第四章第二节中的“责任”一词，应根据其在法律条款中的地位，分别取义务、权利、豁免、责任之意，以使实际承运人既承担承运人的义务与责任，也享受承运人的权利与豁免；对于未就实际承运人与承运人承担连带责任的范围做出规定的法律漏洞，，应以目的性限缩解释进行补充。将与货损发生区段无关的实际承运人排除在责任人之外，仅让实际履行该区段运输的实际承运人与承运人承担连带责任。
[Abstract]:The Maritime Code, following the relevant provisions of the Hamburg rules, introduced the concept of the actual carrier, thus solving the problem of the rights, obligations and responsibilities of the person carrying the goods in practice, An additional remedy has been added to the claim for loss and damage of the goods. However, there are some defects and loopholes in the legislation of the actual carrier, which makes it difficult to learn and master the legal norms. It also makes it more difficult to correctly identify the actual carrier and investigate its legal liability in judicial practice. Based on the investigation of the origin of the actual carrier system, this paper probes into the reasons for the establishment of the system and the legislative intent, and then uses the principles and methods of legal interpretation. The definition and liability of actual carrier are analyzed. It is considered that the terms "entrustment" and "engaged in the carriage of goods" in the definition of the actual carrier should be extended to expand the scope of the actual carrier, and that the term "liability" in chapter IV, section II, should be expanded. According to its position in the legal articles, the meaning of obligation, right, immunity and responsibility should be taken separately, so that the actual carrier can not only bear the duties and responsibilities of the carrier, but also enjoy the rights and immunities of the carrier; The legal loophole which does not provide for the scope of joint and several liability between the actual carrier and the carrier should be supplemented by purposive constriction interpretation. The actual carrier who has nothing to do with the section of the damage is excluded from the responsible person, and only the actual carrier who actually performs the section is jointly and severally liable.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2001
【分类号】：D996.19

【相似文献】