缔约过失责任的损害赔偿范围

发布时间：2018-04-30 20:20

本文选题：损害赔偿范围 + 信赖利益　；参考：《山东大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国在1999年颁发的《合同法》规定了缔约过失责任的一般条款,从而在我国建立起了缔约过失责任制度。但是《合同法》中并没有对缔约过失责任的赔偿范围进行规定,立法上存在一定的空白。同时理论上对缔约过失责任损害赔偿范围没形成统一的意见,研究也不是很深入,实践中留下了大量的自由裁量余地。从目前司法实践看缔约过失损害赔偿责任范围有扩大适用的倾向,以致伤害了实体上的公正。因此,本文拟从以下几个方面对缔约过失责任的损害赔偿范围进行详细研究,以期解决缔约过失责任的损害赔偿范围认定中的问题,为我国立法的完善提供建议。首先,本文简要介绍缔约过失责任制度。通过考察国外立法对缔约过失责任的规定,提出缔约过失责任损害赔偿范围应当包含信赖利益、固有利益,并对缔约损害赔偿中的惩罚性赔偿问题进行了简要的论述。其次,对缔约过失责任损害赔偿范围是否应当受到限制的问题进行讨论。提出对于固有利益的赔偿应当以赔偿实际损失为原则,对信赖利益的赔偿不应当超过履行利益,存在惩罚性赔偿时不受以上限制应以法律明确规定为准。对缔约过失损害赔偿范围的具体认定进行分析,提出认定中应当适用过失相抵规则、损益相抵规则、减损规则；同时对影响缔约过失责任损害赔偿范围的司法价值追求、民商法不同属性、合同条款等重要因素进行分析；对合同不同阶段发生的缔约过失责任损害赔偿范围进行了具体分析,并重点分析了各阶段机会损失的认定问题。最后,对我国立法和司法实践进行了考察,分析了存在的问题。结合上文的分析,提出立法建议。
[Abstract]:The contract Law issued in 1999 stipulates the general clause of fault liability in contracting treaty, and thus establishes the system of fault liability in China. However, there is no stipulation on the scope of compensation for fault liability in contract Law, and there are some gaps in legislation. At the same time, there is no unified opinion on the scope of compensation for damages caused by fault liability in theory, and the research is not very thorough, leaving a large amount of discretion in practice. Judging from the current judicial practice, the scope of liability for compensation for damages caused by fault in contracting has the tendency to be extended and applied, thus harming substantive justice. Therefore, this paper intends to make a detailed study on the scope of compensation for damages of fault liability in contracting treaties from the following aspects, in order to solve the problems in the determination of the scope of compensation for damages of liability for fault in contracting treaties, and to provide suggestions for the perfection of legislation in our country. First of all, this paper briefly introduces the system of fault liability in contracting. By investigating the provisions of foreign legislation on contracting fault liability, this paper puts forward that the scope of damages for contracting fault liability should include trust interests and inherent interests, and briefly discusses the problem of punitive damages in contracting damages. Secondly, it discusses whether the scope of compensation for damages due to fault liability should be restricted. It is proposed that compensation for inherent interests should be based on the principle of compensation for actual losses, and compensation for trust interests should not exceed the interests of performance. When punitive damages exist, the above restrictions should be clearly stipulated in the law. This paper analyzes on the concrete determination of the scope of compensation for damages for fault in contracting, and puts forward that the rules of offset of fault, rules of offset of profits and losses, rules of derogation should be applied in the determination, and at the same time, the pursuit of judicial value that affects the scope of compensation for damages caused by fault liability in concluding treaties, This paper analyzes the different attributes of civil and commercial law, contract terms and other important factors, analyzes the scope of compensation for damages of fault liability in contracting in different stages of the contract, and emphatically analyzes the identification of opportunity loss in each stage. Finally, the legislation and judicial practice of our country are investigated, and the existing problems are analyzed. Combined with the above analysis, the legislative proposals are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】