邮轮旅客权益保障法律问题研究
本文选题:邮轮旅客 + 邮轮旅客权益 ; 参考:《大连海事大学》2016年硕士论文
【摘要】:2013年隶属于中国海航集团的"海娜号"邮轮在韩国被扣引发了国内外的普遍关注,"海娜号"被扣致使旅程无法完成,损害了邮轮旅客根据邮轮合同应享有的权利,限制了邮轮旅客的人身自由,侵害了邮轮旅客的人身权。[1]随着邮轮旅游产业在中国的发展以及普及,社会急需相关的法律和规章制度来保护普通邮轮旅客的权益,以期从根本上解决现阶段邮轮旅客权益保护的问题。本文的写作思路是:分析当前我国邮轮合同订立模式下旅行社、邮轮公司和邮轮旅客这三方法律主体的地位和各自的权利义务,就邮轮旅客权益保护领域内出现的问题进行总结,并在此基础上提出完善我国邮轮旅客权益保护方面的建议。第1章"邮轮旅客权益保障相关概念"首先介绍了与邮轮有关的知识,对邮轮旅客权益的内涵和外延做出了界定,同时对我国邮轮公司、旅行社和邮轮旅客之间的法律关系做了简要的介绍。第2章"旅行社、邮轮公司和邮轮旅客责任分析"主要介绍了当前我国邮轮合同订立模式下,当邮轮旅客的权益受到侵害时,旅行社和邮轮公司应该怎样确认自己的责任。同时以邮轮霸船事件为例,对邮轮旅客的责任进行了简要的介绍。第3章"邮轮旅客应享有的权益及存在的问题",从《旅游法》和《海商法》第五章"海上旅客运输合同"两个角度介绍了我国邮轮旅客应该享有的权益。结合我国邮轮旅客权益保护的现状,指出了我国邮轮旅客权益保护存在的问题。第4章"我国邮轮旅客权益保障制度完善",参考外国关于邮轮旅客权益保护的先进立法,对我国邮轮旅客权益保障提出了几点建议,具体包括完善邮轮旅游纠纷解决途径、构建邮轮公司邮轮合同买卖模式、订立邮轮标准格式合同和制定邮轮相关立法。
[Abstract]:The arrest of the Haina cruise ship in South Korea in 2013, which is part of the China HNA Group, has caused widespread concern at home and abroad. The detention of the Haina has prevented the journey from being completed and undermined the rights of cruise passengers under the cruise contract. It restricts the personal freedom of cruise passengers and infringes on the personal rights of cruise passengers. [1] with the development and popularization of the cruise tourism industry in China, the society urgently needs relevant laws and regulations to protect the rights and interests of ordinary cruise passengers. In order to fundamentally solve the problem of the protection of cruise passengers' rights and interests at this stage. The writing ideas of this paper are as follows: analysis of the status and respective rights and obligations of travel agencies, cruise companies and cruise passengers under the current mode of concluding cruise contracts in China. This paper summarizes the problems in the field of the protection of cruise passengers' rights and puts forward some suggestions on how to improve the protection of the rights and interests of cruise passengers in China. Chapter 1 "related concepts of the protection of the rights and interests of cruise passengers" first introduces the knowledge related to cruise ships, defines the connotation and extension of the rights and interests of cruise passengers, and at the same time defines the cruise companies in China. The legal relationship between travel agencies and cruise passengers is briefly introduced. Chapter 2 "liability Analysis of Travel Service, Cruise Company and Cruise passenger" mainly introduces how the travel agency and cruise company should confirm their responsibility when the rights and interests of cruise passengers are infringed under the current mode of conclusion of cruise contract in China. At the same time, taking the case of cruise ship hegemony as an example, the responsibility of cruise passengers is briefly introduced. Chapter 3, "the rights and interests of cruise passengers and their existing problems", introduces the rights and interests of cruise passengers in China from the angles of "Tourism Law" and "Maritime Law" Chapter V "contract of Carriage of passengers by Sea". Combined with the present situation of the protection of cruise passengers' rights and interests in China, the problems in the protection of cruise passengers' rights and interests in China are pointed out. Chapter 4, "perfecting the system of protecting the rights and interests of cruise passengers in China", refers to the advanced legislation of foreign countries on the protection of the rights and interests of cruise passengers, and puts forward several suggestions for the protection of the rights and interests of cruise passengers in China, including, in particular, the ways to improve the settlement of disputes over cruise tourism. Build the model of the cruise contract, make the standard form contract of the cruise and make the related legislation of the cruise.
【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:D922.294;D922.294
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 辛林;;邮轮承运人若干法律问题研究[J];集美大学学报(自然科学版);2014年06期
2 贺电;孙洪波;;法治:权利义务平衡之治[J];广东社会科学;2014年06期
3 吕方园;郭萍;;邮轮霸船之法律考量——以《旅游法》为分析进路[J];旅游学刊;2014年10期
4 汪传才;;关于旅游合同示范文本的法律思考[J];旅游学刊;2014年07期
5 彭卫东;;“霸船”现象剖析、预防与对策[J];中国水运;2014年04期
6 马炎秋;余娅楠;;美国邮轮旅客保护立法动态研究[J];中国海商法研究;2014年01期
7 郭萍;吕方园;;邮轮霸船:维权抑或霸权[J];理论与现代化;2013年05期
8 李小年;颜晨广;;中国发展邮轮产业的若干政策与法律问题[J];中国海商法研究;2013年03期
9 周江洪;;从“旅游辅助服务者”到“履行辅助人”[J];旅游学刊;2013年09期
10 周晓晨;;论旅游服务提供者在包价旅游合同中的法律地位及责任[J];旅游学刊;2013年07期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 郑志军;国际海运承运人之履行辅助人责任问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2011年
2 夏雨;跨国旅游服务纠纷解决机制研究[D];武汉大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 余娅楠;邮轮承运人对邮轮旅客的民事法律责任研究[D];中国海洋大学;2014年
2 周筱蕴;旅行社与履行辅助人的责任分配问题研究[D];浙江大学;2014年
3 杨伊;自助旅游者权益保护研究[D];宁夏大学;2014年
4 卢佳佳;旅游辅助服务者的安全保障义务研究[D];安徽财经大学;2013年
5 姬慧萍;包价旅游合同研究[D];中国政法大学;2011年
6 谢代明;邮轮承运人责任分析[D];大连海事大学;2011年
7 马平海;旅行社的安全保障义务及责任[D];兰州大学;2010年
8 陈红;海上旅客运输合同法律制度问题研究[D];哈尔滨工程大学;2009年
9 孔健;旅游合同中旅行社责任研究[D];苏州大学;2007年
10 韩宏涛;上海发展国际邮轮经济研究[D];上海海事大学;2005年
,本文编号:1872574
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/1872574.html

