商业秘密侵权及其民事司法救济探讨
发布时间:2018-05-23 07:50
本文选题:商业秘密 + 民事侵权 ; 参考:《湘潭大学》2003年硕士论文
【摘要】: 当今,世界上许多国家的法律对于商业秘密侵权及其民事司法救济制度均作了规定,中外学者在此问题上也进行了深入研究,且成果颇丰。然而,学界及实务界对于如何加强理论研究与司法实践的结合问题涉及者不是很多,且认识不一。我国学界对于商业秘密侵权及其民事司法救济制度的研究起步较晚,现行法律对这一制度的规定还不够完善,不能适应复杂多变的经济生活的需要。因此,进一步深入研究这一制度,特别是加强理论研究与司法实践之间的有机结合就显得十分必要。 本文从商业秘密法保护公平竞争、维护商业秘密权利人合法权益的根本宗旨出发,结合我国商业秘密保护的司法实践,紧扣商业秘密及商业秘密侵权行为的本质进行探讨,,对商业秘密侵权民事司法救济制度的几个主要问题进行了系统阐述,以期实现对我国商业秘密侵权民事司法救济理论研究的丰富与深化,并对我国商业秘密保护的司法实践有所裨益。 本文旨在通过对商业秘密法律保护理论的历史沿革与发展、商业秘密侵权行为与一般侵权行为构成之不同要求、商业秘密保护的中外立法与司法实践等方面进行考察分析,澄清在商业秘密及商业秘密侵权行为的构成、商业秘密侵权民事司法救济等方面存在的认识误区,寻求适当的解决方案,以实现理论研究与司法实践的有机结合。 鉴于我国现行法律对于商业秘密侵权民事司法救济制度规定得不很规范和具体,有些规定还与WTO有关规则相冲突,因此,有 WP=19 必要进一步完善之。本文提出应在坚持商业秘密法根本宗旨,适当借鉴国外有益的理论成果和立法经验的前提下,结合我国国情,通过立法将商业秘密侵权行为的本质、类型、确认原则、损害赔偿及其归责原则等方面的规定有机地统一起来,从而构建科学的、符合当今经济生活需要的商业秘密侵权民事司法救济制度。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, the laws of many countries in the world provide for the infringement of trade secrets and the system of civil judicial relief. Chinese and foreign scholars have also made a thorough study on this issue, and the results have been quite fruitful. However, there are not many scholars and practitioners involved in how to strengthen the combination of theoretical research and judicial practice. The research on the infringement of trade secrets and its civil judicial relief system in Chinese academic circles started late, and the current law on this system is not perfect enough to adapt to the needs of complex and changeable economic life. Therefore, it is necessary to further study this system, especially to strengthen the organic combination of theoretical research and judicial practice. Starting from the fundamental purpose of protecting fair competition and safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the right holders of trade secrets, this paper discusses the essence of trade secrets and their infringing acts in accordance with the judicial practice of the protection of trade secrets in our country. In order to enrich and deepen the theoretical research on the civil judicial remedy of trade secret infringement in China, this paper systematically expounds several main problems of the civil judicial remedy system of trade secret infringement, in order to realize the enrichment and deepening of the theoretical research on the civil judicial remedy of trade secret infringement. It is beneficial to the judicial practice of trade secret protection in our country. The purpose of this paper is to investigate and analyze the historical evolution and development of the theory of legal protection of trade secrets, the different requirements of the constitution of the tort of trade secret and the general tort, and the legislation and judicial practice of the protection of trade secret in China and abroad, and so on. This paper clarifies the misunderstanding existing in the aspects of trade secret and the constitution of trade secret infringement, the civil judicial remedy of trade secret infringement, and seeks appropriate solutions to realize the organic combination of theoretical research and judicial practice. In view of the fact that the current law of our country does not regulate and specify the civil judicial relief system for the infringement of trade secrets, some of the provisions conflict with the relevant rules of WTO, therefore, there are WP=19 It is necessary to further improve it. This paper puts forward that under the premise of adhering to the fundamental purpose of the trade secret law, drawing on the beneficial theoretical achievements and legislative experience of foreign countries appropriately, combining with the national conditions of our country, the essence, types and principles of the infringement of trade secret should be confirmed by legislation. The rules of compensation for damages and their imputation principles are organically unified, so as to construct a scientific judicial relief system for infringement of trade secrets in accordance with the needs of today's economic life.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2003
【分类号】:D913
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 郝建伟;商业秘密侵权法律救济制度研究[D];西南财经大学;2009年
2 李燕平;商业秘密侵权损害赔偿研究[D];北京化工大学;2013年
本文编号:1923887
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/1923887.html