论观念交付

发布时间：2018-05-23 11:23

本文选题：观念交付 + 观念交付的价值　；参考：《黑龙江大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 我国《物权法》已经制定完毕并且公布实施。庆幸的是,观念交付被写进其中。观念交付使得交付类型更加的丰富,它之所以被立法者所认可完全是为了满足交易便捷、迅速的需要。《物权法》中明确了观念交付具有物权变动的效力,但对观念交付的其他效力以及如何适用的问题没有涉及,这为我们在逻辑和体系结构上探讨和研究观念交付制度留出了更大的空间。本文着重以动产的观念交付为研究对象,以观念交付的概观、价值、效力、适用为研究内容,其中以观念交付效力和适用为研究重点。笔者结合我国现行立法和德国、日本以及台湾地区民法,对观念交付及其相关的体系制度进行详尽分析。全文共分绪论、正文、结论三部分。第一章:观念交付之概观。本章分三节,主要介绍观念交付的历史源起和具体类型。本章首先介绍罗马法时期观念交付具体形态的雏形,出现了替代现实交付的短手交付、长手交付、占有协议三种形式,并对其表现进行详细介绍。目的是从历史发展的角度来探析观念交付制度。接着结合近现代国家立法,对观念交付具体形态,即简易交付、指示交付、占有改定加以介绍。最后,笔者建议尊重间接占有的存在。着重强调间接占有为观念交付提供了强有力的理论支撑。第二章:观念交付的价值。本章主要探讨观念交付的效率价值和安全价值,以及观念交付的价值冲突的认识。首先,从一般意义上剖析效率和安全的法理意义。指出效率存在的价值在于使资源配置最优化,安全存在的价值则是对现存利益的维护。其次,论述观念交付具有突出的效率价值,并且强调观念交付中效率价值并不是与所有的安全价值相冲突,指出效率价值与安全价值中的静的安全价值相一致,与动的安全价值(交易安全)相矛盾。最后,主张坚持追求高效率的同时,采取制度设计的办法来克服观念交付的弊端。第三章:观念交付的效力。本章从观念交付的形成力、对抗力和公信力三个角度对观念交付的效力进行全面阐述。笔者认为,观念交付的形成力与其对抗力的强弱程度成正比,而观念交付的对抗力和其公信力的强弱程度成反比。首先,对意思主义和形式主义物权变动模式进行梳理,表明采纳不同的模式在发生物权变动上存在差异。其次,介绍观念交付的效力主要内容。第一,观念交付的形成力在意思主义和形式主义物权变动模式的国家一般都予以承认。第二,从观念交付的对抗力的角度进一步对观念交付的效力加以诠释,观念交付的对抗力是对新物权人的保护,维护物权变动结果,防止他人介入对新形成的物权关系加以破坏。第三,对观念交付的公信力加以介绍。介绍公示与公信的关系问题,为了公示瑕疵时保护信赖者利益。最后,介绍观念交付的公示力整体上趋弱,进而说明观念交付后,往往公示表征的权利和实质权利不一致,使公信力更有了适用的前提,肯定了观念交付公信力存在的必要性。第四章:观念交付的适用。首先,介绍观念交付在不动产变动中的适用问题,强调观念交付可以存在于不动产变动过程中,但只是其中的一个环节。在形式主义立法模式下,登记最终起决定性的作用。其次,介绍观念交付在善意取得制度中的适用。主张简易交付和指示交付可适用于善意取得,而依占有改定方式不能成立善意取得。最后,介绍观念交付和动产质权、留置权的关系问题。观念交付中惟有占有改定不能适用于动产质权和留置权,其他两种形态可以成立动产质权和留置权。第五章:结论。对全文做最后总结。
[Abstract]:Our country's property law has been formulated and published. Fortunately, conceptual delivery is written in it. Concept delivery makes the delivery type more rich. It is recognized by the legislator to meet the convenience of the transaction and the rapid need. The other effects of delivery and the problem of how to apply are not involved, which has left more space for us to explore and study the system of conceptual delivery in logic and architecture.
This paper focuses on the delivery of the concept of movable property as the research object, with the introduction, value, effectiveness and application of concept delivery as the research content. The research focuses on the effectiveness and application of concept delivery. The author makes a detailed analysis of the concept delivery and related system system in combination with the current legislation of our country and the civil law of Germany, Japan and Taiwan. The full text is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion.
The first chapter is an overview of the concept delivery. This chapter is divided into three sections. This chapter mainly introduces the historical origin and specific types of concept delivery. This chapter first introduces the embryonic form of the concrete delivery of the concept of the Rome law period, the short hand delivery of replacement reality delivery, the long hand delivery, the possession of the three forms of possession, and the detailed introduction of its performance. The purpose is from the purpose of the chapter. In the view of the historical development, the concept delivery system is analyzed. Then, combining the modern national legislation, the concept delivery is presented in a specific form, namely, simple delivery, instruction delivery, and possession modification. Finally, the author suggests respect for the existence of indirect possession.
The second chapter: the value of concept delivery. This chapter mainly discusses the efficiency value and safety value of concept delivery, as well as the understanding of the value conflict in concept delivery. First, it analyzes the legal meaning of efficiency and safety in general meaning. It points out that the value of efficiency lies in the optimization of the allocation of resources, and the value of the existence of security is to the existing interests. Secondly, it is pointed out that the concept delivery has outstanding efficiency value, and emphasizes that the efficiency value of the concept delivery is not conflicted with all the safety values, points out that the efficiency value is consistent with the static security value in the safety value, and contradicts the dynamic safety value (transaction safety). Finally, it advocates insisting on the pursuit of high efficiency. In order to overcome the drawbacks of conceptual delivery, we adopt institutional design.
The third chapter: the effectiveness of concept delivery. This chapter expounds the effectiveness of concept delivery from the three angles of the formative force, antagonism and credibility of concept delivery. The author believes that the formative force of concept delivery is directly proportional to the strength and strength of resistance, and the antagonism of conceptual delivery is inversely proportional to the strength of its credibility. The pattern of the change of idealism and formalism property right shows that there are differences in the change of real right in the adoption of different modes. Secondly, the main content of the effectiveness of concept delivery is introduced. First, the formative force of conceptual delivery is generally acknowledged in the states of the mode of change of meaning and formalism. Second, from the concept of delivery. The angle of antagonism further interprets the effectiveness of the concept delivery. The antagonism of the concept delivery is the protection of the new real right person, the maintenance of the result of the change of real right, and the prevention of the involvement of others to destroy the newly formed real right relationship. Third, introduce the credibility of the concept delivery. It protects the interests of the trustor when it is defective. Finally, it introduces the overall weakness of the public indication of concept delivery, and then shows that after the delivery of the concept, the right of public representation is often not consistent with the substantive rights, which makes the public credibility more applicable, and affirms the necessity of the existence of the public faith in concept delivery.
The fourth chapter: the application of concept delivery. First, it introduces the application of concept delivery in the change of real estate, emphasizes that concept delivery can exist in the process of real estate change, but it is only one of the links. In the formalist legislative mode, registration eventually plays a decisive role. Secondly, the introduction of concept delivery in the bona fide acquisition system It holds that simple delivery and directive delivery can be applied to bona fide acquisition, but the acquisition of good faith can not be established in the way of possession modification. Finally, it introduces the relationship between the concept delivery and the pledge of movable property and the lien right. The only possession in the concept delivery can not be applied to the pledge and retention of movable property, and the other two forms can set up the pledge of chattel. And lien right.
The fifth chapter: conclusion. The final summary of the full text.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D923.2

【引证文献】