票据保证问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-29 08:23

本文选题：保证 + 票据保证　；参考：《吉林大学》2007年硕士论文

【摘要】： 票据保证制度是为了保护票据债权人的利益,促进票据安全快捷流通而设计的一项票据制度。票据保证即票据债务人以外的人为担保票据债务的履行,以负担同一内容的票据债务为目的,在票据上记载有关事项并签章,然后将票据交还请求保证人的一种附属票据行为。票据保证制度是民法保证制度在商法领域的展开与延伸,因而票据保证既有民事保证的色彩,即从属性,又有票据行为的色彩,即独立性,是二者矛盾的结合。由于我国长期实行计划经济,商品经济发展较为缓慢,加之我国传统的立法模式为民商合一,很多人看待票据法中的保证制度还是停留在传统的民法意识层面,而没有上升到商法意识层面,因而显得不十分科学。本文从论述票据保证制度的概念和现状入手,粗浅的概述了票据保证制度的构成要件、票据保证与相关概念的比较、票据保证人的责任与权利等内容,在分析了国内外票据保证的相关内容的基础之上,又从实证的角度,剖析了实务中存在的诸多问题,考察了各国的立法实例,提出了完善我国《票据法》中票据保证制度的一些建议。
[Abstract]:Bill guarantee system is designed to protect the interests of creditors and promote the safe and fast circulation of bills. The negotiable instrument guarantee is a kind of subsidiary act which guarantees the performance of the debt of the instrument outside the debtor of the instrument and records the relevant items and signs on the instrument in order to bear the same content of the debt of the instrument, and then returns the instrument to the surety. Bill guarantee system is the expansion and extension of civil law guarantee system in the field of commercial law. Therefore, bill guarantee has the color of civil guarantee, that is, subordinate attribute, and the color of bill behavior, that is, independence, which is the combination of the two contradictions. Because of the long term planned economy, the slow development of commodity economy, and the integration of civil and commercial people in the traditional legislative model, many people think that the guarantee system in the negotiable instrument law still stays at the level of the traditional civil law consciousness. And did not rise to the level of commercial law consciousness, so it is not very scientific. This paper begins with the concept and present situation of negotiable instrument guarantee system, summarizes the composing elements of bill guarantee system, the comparison between bill guarantee and related concepts, the responsibility and right of bill guarantor, etc. On the basis of analyzing the relevant contents of bill guarantee at home and abroad, and from the perspective of empirical analysis, this paper analyzes many problems existing in practice, and examines the legislative examples of various countries. Some suggestions are put forward to perfect the negotiable instrument guarantee system in our country's negotiable instrument Law.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：D922.287

【相似文献】