格式条款立法缺陷之分析

发布时间：2018-06-01 02:16

本文选题：格式条款 + 格式合同　；参考：《法律适用》2005年11期

【摘要】：正20世纪以来,契约法发展出现的新趋向即格式合同的广泛采用。当前,格式合同已成为一项社会经济生活中至为重要的交易形式,被普遍地适用于经济生活的各个方面,但格式合同是现代经济生活的双刃剑,尽管它具有提高交易效率、节约缔约费用和成本、增进交易安全等价值,但另一方面,使用人以不公平格式条款侵害相对人利益的现象大量存在,如果法律不能对格式合同进行有效合理的规制,格式合同则可能成为经济上的强者压迫弱者的工具。为此,现代各国都很注重格式合同的立法。而在我国,“长期以来在立法上表现出对格式合同的不重视和宽容态度。”一直没有单行的格式合同规制法。在《合同法》颁布以前,对格式合同的规制主要散见于《消费者权益保护法》第24条、《海商法》第126条以及《保险法》第17条
[Abstract]:Since the 20th century, the new trend of the development of contract law is the widespread adoption of format contract. At present, format contract has become a most important transaction form in social and economic life, which is widely applied to all aspects of economic life, but format contract is a double-edged sword of modern economic life, although it can improve the transaction efficiency. On the other hand, the phenomenon that the user infringes the interests of the relative party with the unfair form clause is widespread, if the law can not effectively and reasonably regulate the format contract, Format contracts may become an economic tool for the strong to oppress the weak. To this end, modern countries have attached great importance to the form of contract legislation. But in our country, "for a long time in the legislation shows to the format contract not to attach importance and the tolerance attitude." There has been no single-line format contract regulation law. Before the promulgation of the contract Law, the regulation of formal contracts was mainly scattered in Article 24 of the Consumer Rights and interests Protection Act, Article 126 of the Maritime Law and Article 17 of the Insurance Law.
【作者单位】：甘肃政法学院
【分类号】：D923.6

【共引文献】