当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 商法论文 >

论我国海事行政救济存在的问题及完善

发布时间:2018-08-11 19:22
【摘要】:海事行政救济是指公民、法人以及其他组织因权利(甚至公益)受到海事行政管理机关瑕疵行政行为之侵害时,对于受侵害的主体依法给予行政体系内及行政体系外(主要是司法体系)之保护措施,属于善后性质的消极作为,即无侵害无救济,海事行政救济因相对人事后提起,具有补救性。同时,海事行政救济关乎实体性规范和程序性规范的实现,其应该以保护相对人的合法权益为最主要目的。在我国,海事行政复议以及海事行政诉讼是海事权利救济的两种最主要的方法与途径。近年来,国外学者围绕海事行政法这一主题,产生的研究成果不少,但国内研究始终并不显得火热,特别是权利救济方面有许多问题值得系统研究。 本文集中阐述了海事行政法以及海事行政救济的相关概念及内涵,围绕我国海事行政权利人在寻求权利救济的过程中可能遇到的一些问题,着重对海事行政复议以及海事行政诉讼中存在的问题做了相应的分析,剖析了海事行政复议的范围、复议机构的独立性以及复议调解制度的适用,讨论了海事行政诉讼的管辖权,就海事行政诉讼中船舶的主体资格提出了个人的看法,并对海事行政复议与诉讼的衔接进行了一定的思考。 本文系运用实证分析以及案例分析的方法进行的专题研究。全文分3个部分:第一部分,旨在介绍海事行政法和海事行政救济的基本理论,这是指导本文写作的理论基础,第二部分,主要研究我国海事行政救济存在的问题,本文的着重点在探讨海事行政复议和海事行政诉讼存在的缺陷,第三部分,分别从法学基本理论、现有法律以及当前实践等多个角度对存在的问题进行了逐步分析,进而提出了一定的完善我国海事行政救济的意见。 本文主要创新体现在把海商法中对物诉讼的理论引入海事行政法学。对物诉讼原本是英美海商法中的最富有魅力的理论之一,因国际货物与贸易蓬勃发展,国际法发展迅速,渐渐地该理论为很多国家海商法所接受。我国海商法吸收了该理论的优秀成果。
[Abstract]:Maritime administrative relief refers to citizens, legal persons and other organizations whose rights (or even public welfare) are infringed upon by the defective administrative acts of maritime administrative organs, The protection measures given by the subject to the administrative system and outside the administrative system (mainly the judicial system) according to law are negative acts of the nature of rehabilitation, that is, no infringement and no relief, and the maritime administrative relief is brought afterwards by the counterpart, It is remedial. At the same time, maritime administrative relief is related to the realization of substantive and procedural norms, and its main purpose should be to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the counterpart. In China, maritime administrative reconsideration and maritime administrative litigation are the two most important ways and means to remedy maritime rights. In recent years, foreign scholars around the theme of maritime administrative law, produced a lot of research results, but the domestic research is not always hot, especially in the right relief aspect there are many problems worthy of systematic study. This paper focuses on the related concepts and connotations of maritime administrative law and maritime administrative relief, and focuses on some problems that may be encountered in the process of seeking right relief for maritime administrative right holders in our country. The paper emphatically analyzes the problems existing in maritime administrative reconsideration and maritime administrative litigation, analyzes the scope of maritime administrative reconsideration, the independence of reconsideration organization and the application of reconsideration mediation system. This paper discusses the jurisdiction of maritime administrative litigation, puts forward personal views on the subject qualification of ships in maritime administrative litigation, and gives some thoughts on the connection between maritime administrative reconsideration and litigation. This paper is a case study using empirical analysis and case analysis. The thesis is divided into three parts: the first part is to introduce the basic theory of maritime administrative law and maritime administrative relief, which is the theoretical basis to guide the writing of this paper, the second part is mainly to study the existing problems of maritime administrative relief in China. This paper focuses on discussing the defects of maritime administrative reconsideration and maritime administrative litigation. In the third part, the existing problems are analyzed step by step from the basic theory of law, existing law and current practice, etc. Furthermore, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to improve the maritime administrative relief in our country. The main innovation of this paper is to introduce the theory of action in rem into maritime administrative law. Action in rem was originally one of the most attractive theories in British and American maritime law. Due to the booming development of international goods and trade, international law developed rapidly, and gradually this theory was accepted by many countries' maritime law. China's maritime law absorbs the outstanding achievements of the theory.
【学位授予单位】:湖南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D922.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 何畏;浅析《海事诉讼特别程序法》中的对物诉讼制度[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2002年03期

2 王秀芬;海事行政法学科体系及其特点初探[J];当代法学;2001年10期

3 胡敏洁;;论行政法中的案例研究方法[J];当代法学;2010年01期

4 王世涛;;海事行政法的困境与出路[J];大连海事大学学报(社会科学版);2007年06期

5 王世涛;;海事行政法论纲[J];大连海事大学学报(社会科学版);2010年01期

6 林宗仁;陈德元;;论行政复议案件纠纷解决机制中引入调解制度[J];公安学刊.浙江公安高等专科学校学报;2006年01期

7 林日华;;论行政复议适用调解[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2007年05期

8 司玉琢,胡正良,曹冲;试论海法独立学科体系[J];航海教育研究;1997年01期

9 李晓文;;我国部门行政法研究现状及其完善[J];内江科技;2010年09期

10 苏健;;关于行政复议调解制度在海事行政复议中的运用[J];中国海事;2009年04期

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 于萍;英美海事对物诉讼中的船舶扣押制度研究[D];大连海事大学;2006年

2 罗造祉;海事行政审判权由海事法院行使为宜[D];上海海事大学;2006年

3 胡江山;海事行政法研究[D];大连海事大学;2008年



本文编号:2177999

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2177999.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户08869***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com