意思表示理论问题研究
[Abstract]:The theory of expression of will is an important theory in the civil law of the continental law system. The theory and system of legal behavior established by the historical school of law represented by Savini is a great creation of the tradition of civil law in the civil law system of the continental law system. The establishment of the theory of scientific expression of will help to construct a scientific system of legal behavior, and then adapt to the needs of diversification and development of legal acts resulting from the rapid development of modern society, and perfect the system of civil law. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to guide the legislation and judicature of specific legal acts, and even to study and study civil law. From the point of view of personal interest and social public interest, the expression of will has different elements. From the perspective of the self-interest of the ideographer, the expression of will should pursue its true meaning, which consists of four elements: the effect of meaning, the meaning of behavior, the meaning of expression and the act of expression; however, in order to maintain the trust interests of the three persons and the safety of social transactions, Any "representation" of the ideographer is its meaningful expression, so the expression of will is only based on the expressive behavior of the ideographer. In modern civil law countries, the theory and system of expression of will are constructed by the concept of compromises of the constituent elements of will expression. Based on the concept of compromises in the expression of will, the validity of the established expression of will is based on its subject qualification; the determination of the content, the possibility, the legality, the legitimacy: the ability to be perceived by the outsider as a condition, The complete possession of a condition here is the norm of the expression of will, but it is often not fully possessed, and any of these conditions affect the effectiveness of the expression of intention when it is not or is not fully available. In addition to the effective elements of the expression of intention, the effective time of the expression of intention and the attachment have an important effect on whether and when the expression of intention becomes effective, The explanation of the expression of intention also plays an important role in the effect of what it takes place. China's civil law inherits the core content of the theory of expression of will in the great international law system and tries to develop in the judicial practice in combination with China's national conditions. However, when the expression of will constitutes L, there is no clear value orientation, and the expression of will constitutes ambiguity. In the meaning of the effectiveness of the provisions there are a number of incomprehensible, unscientific place. On the basis of drawing lessons from the theory of expression of will in civil law system, China should aim at the different value tendency and essence of civil law and commercial law, and the concept of constitution of expression of will in architectural science. Zhou Yancheng stipulated the effective requirements for the expression of will, and summed up and developed the theory in practice, which contributed to the formulation of a science. It is of great significance to complete the civil code and perfect the system and structure of civil law. This paper takes the effectiveness of the expression of will as the main line, analyzes the constituent elements of the will, the effective elements, and other factors that affect the effectiveness. From the perspective of comparative law, the specific provisions of civil law countries are investigated. Compared with the specific provisions of Chinese civil law and the specific situation of China's practice, this paper puts forward the historical turn of inheritance and development. How to apply and develop the theory of expression of will in Chinese civil law. Key words: the legal act means the legal effect of the relative party
【学位授予单位】:四川大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2004
【分类号】:D923
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李明发,朱庆;建筑物区分所有人之成员权性质探究——兼论《民法典》中之相关制度安排[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2004年01期
2 江平;;民法的回顾与展望[J];比较法研究;2006年02期
3 李显冬;民法典应当是市场经济最一般的行为规则——时代迫切呼唤《中华人民共和国民法典》的早日诞生[J];中国司法;2005年03期
4 刘正峰;;论无名物权的物权法保护——从对物权法定原则的检讨展开[J];法商研究;2006年02期
5 姚辉;法典化的趋同与鸿沟[J];法学杂志;2004年02期
6 马俊驹;宋刚;;民事主体功能论——兼论国家作为民事主体[J];法学家;2003年06期
7 冯乐坤;民法设计思路之检讨——从法人角度观察[J];法学评论;2004年02期
8 任尔昕,马建兵;论我国企业立法的宏观思路——从商事立法的角度分析[J];法学;2005年04期
9 杨继;;商法通则统一立法的必要性和可行性[J];法学;2006年04期
10 张礼洪;;民法典的分解现象和中国民法典的制定[J];法学;2006年05期
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 赵廉慧;财产权的概念[D];中国政法大学;2003年
2 萧博仁;物权法基本原则研究[D];中国政法大学;2004年
3 吴卓;我国证券交易所法律形态和治理结构问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2004年
4 尹志强;论民事权利在私法中的救济[D];中国政法大学;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 邓邯;试论人格权在民法典体系中的地位[D];西南政法大学;2003年
2 刘建光;法律行为违法问题研究[D];吉林大学;2004年
3 范雪飞;理性主义下的民法法典化[D];西南政法大学;2004年
4 周朝霞;论我国民法时效制度的完善[D];对外经济贸易大学;2005年
5 王宏;论请求权在民法典中的设立[D];安徽大学;2005年
6 韩文苑;商事合伙主体地位辨析[D];中国政法大学;2006年
7 马建兵;论物权法中的私法自治[D];兰州大学;2006年
8 陆青;论合同法的现代趋同[D];华东政法学院;2006年
9 王英英;试论我国现行合伙制度的立法完善[D];东北财经大学;2005年
10 岳政坤;论罗马法对中国近代民法体系形成的影响[D];黑龙江大学;2005年
本文编号:2185968
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2185968.html