浅议目的港无人提货的法律问题
发布时间：2018-12-17 17:04
【摘要】：随着国际贸易的蓬勃发展,无人提货案件也越来越多。目的港无人提货的发生不仅给双方当事人以及承运人带来了巨大的麻烦与损失,还影响了国际贸易的正常秩序,浪费了社会的财富。但是目前有关目的港无人提货问题的法律规定比较欠缺,这个法律问题应该引起我们的重视。本文采用理论和实证分析相结合的办法讨论了目的港无人提货的法律问题。同时,对解决目的港无人提货问题提出了一些建议。 本文的正文分为三章: 第一章介绍了目的港无人提货的概况。本章首先从一组数据和案例出发阐述了目的港无人提货司法救济的现状,随着国际贸易的蓬勃发展,无人提货的案件越来越多,但是这类案件的当事人却很难得到法律的救济;接着概括了发生目的港无人提货时,承运人可能面临的损失:海运费、货物保管费、集装箱超期占用费等;本章最后一部分分析了造成目的港无人提货的原因:海上货物运输合同纠纷、国际贸易合同纠纷、目的港所在国家本身的法律、法规、贸易制度和检疫规定等。 第二章探讨了目的港无人提货存在的法律问题。在司法实践中发现,由于现行法律存在一定的不足之处,承运人由于到港货物无人提取所造成的损失即便诉诸法律,也往往难以得到补偿。本章通过一些实例总结了目的港无人提货主要存在以下法律问题:法律规定模糊造成责任主体以及规定的期限不明确、法律对于留置和拍卖的规定不明确、缺乏关于海事提存的制度以及救济途径之间存在着冲突。 第三章分析了解决目的港无人提货问题的建议及立法完善方向。在本章中针对我国《海商法》在处理目的港无人提货问题中存在的不足之处,提出了以下几点建议:明确无人提货案件责任主体和法律规定的期限、完善《海商法》关于海事留置权和拍卖的规定、在《海商法》中制定符合海上货物运输的承运人提存制度、将《海关法》与《海商法》的有关目的港无人提货的法律规定相协调为产生争议的当事人提供统一的法律依据、迟到的公正算不得真正的公正,要解决目的港无人提货问题还要求司法机关提高司法效率使当事人的合法权利得到及时有效地保护。 我们期待现行法律存在的问题能早日在立法中得以完善!
[Abstract]:With the vigorous development of international trade, there are more and more cases of no-delivery. The occurrence of uncollected goods in the port of destination not only brings great troubles and losses to both parties and carriers, but also affects the normal order of international trade and wastes the wealth of the society. However, the current legal provisions on the issue of undelivered goods in the port of destination are relatively deficient, and this legal issue should attract our attention. In this paper, the legal problem of undelivered goods in the port of destination is discussed by means of theoretical and empirical analysis. At the same time, some suggestions are put forward to solve the problem of undelivered goods in the port of destination. The text of this paper is divided into three chapters: the first chapter introduces the general situation of the port of destination. This chapter starts from a set of data and cases to explain the status of judicial relief of the port of destination, with the vigorous development of international trade, there are more and more cases of no-delivery, but the parties in such cases are very difficult to obtain legal relief; Then it summarizes the possible losses that the carrier may face when the port of destination is not picked up: sea freight, cargo custody fee, container occupancy fee and so on; In the last part of this chapter, the author analyzes the causes of the unsolicited goods in the port of destination: the disputes of the contract of carriage of goods by sea, the disputes of international trade contracts, the laws, regulations, trade regulations and quarantine regulations of the countries where the port of destination is located. The second chapter discusses the legal problems existing in the port of destination. In judicial practice, it is found that due to the shortcomings of the current law, it is often difficult for the carrier to obtain compensation for the loss caused by the unclaimed goods at the port of arrival. Through some examples, this chapter summarizes the following legal problems in the port of destination: the ambiguity of legal provisions makes the subject of responsibility and the specified period unclear, and the provisions of the law on retention and auction are not clear. There is a conflict between the lack of the system of maritime depository and the way of relief. The third chapter analyzes the suggestions and legislative direction to solve the problem of uncollected goods in the port of destination. In this chapter, in view of the shortcomings of China's Maritime Law in dealing with the problem of unsolicited goods in the port of destination, some suggestions are put forward as follows: make clear the subject of liability and the time limit stipulated by law in the case of unsolicited goods. To perfect the maritime lien and auction provisions of the Maritime Law, and to formulate in the Maritime Law a system of depositing by carriers in accordance with the carriage of goods by sea, To coordinate the Customs Law with the legal provisions of the Maritime Law relating to the port of destination where no goods have been picked up, and to provide a unified legal basis for the parties in dispute, and a late justice is not a true justice, In order to solve the problem of unsolicited goods in the port of destination, the judicial authorities should improve the judicial efficiency so that the legal rights of the parties concerned can be protected in a timely and effective manner. We look forward to the problems existing in the existing laws can be improved in the legislation at an early date!
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.294
本文编号：2384487
[Abstract]:With the vigorous development of international trade, there are more and more cases of no-delivery. The occurrence of uncollected goods in the port of destination not only brings great troubles and losses to both parties and carriers, but also affects the normal order of international trade and wastes the wealth of the society. However, the current legal provisions on the issue of undelivered goods in the port of destination are relatively deficient, and this legal issue should attract our attention. In this paper, the legal problem of undelivered goods in the port of destination is discussed by means of theoretical and empirical analysis. At the same time, some suggestions are put forward to solve the problem of undelivered goods in the port of destination. The text of this paper is divided into three chapters: the first chapter introduces the general situation of the port of destination. This chapter starts from a set of data and cases to explain the status of judicial relief of the port of destination, with the vigorous development of international trade, there are more and more cases of no-delivery, but the parties in such cases are very difficult to obtain legal relief; Then it summarizes the possible losses that the carrier may face when the port of destination is not picked up: sea freight, cargo custody fee, container occupancy fee and so on; In the last part of this chapter, the author analyzes the causes of the unsolicited goods in the port of destination: the disputes of the contract of carriage of goods by sea, the disputes of international trade contracts, the laws, regulations, trade regulations and quarantine regulations of the countries where the port of destination is located. The second chapter discusses the legal problems existing in the port of destination. In judicial practice, it is found that due to the shortcomings of the current law, it is often difficult for the carrier to obtain compensation for the loss caused by the unclaimed goods at the port of arrival. Through some examples, this chapter summarizes the following legal problems in the port of destination: the ambiguity of legal provisions makes the subject of responsibility and the specified period unclear, and the provisions of the law on retention and auction are not clear. There is a conflict between the lack of the system of maritime depository and the way of relief. The third chapter analyzes the suggestions and legislative direction to solve the problem of uncollected goods in the port of destination. In this chapter, in view of the shortcomings of China's Maritime Law in dealing with the problem of unsolicited goods in the port of destination, some suggestions are put forward as follows: make clear the subject of liability and the time limit stipulated by law in the case of unsolicited goods. To perfect the maritime lien and auction provisions of the Maritime Law, and to formulate in the Maritime Law a system of depositing by carriers in accordance with the carriage of goods by sea, To coordinate the Customs Law with the legal provisions of the Maritime Law relating to the port of destination where no goods have been picked up, and to provide a unified legal basis for the parties in dispute, and a late justice is not a true justice, In order to solve the problem of unsolicited goods in the port of destination, the judicial authorities should improve the judicial efficiency so that the legal rights of the parties concerned can be protected in a timely and effective manner. We look forward to the problems existing in the existing laws can be improved in the legislation at an early date!
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.294
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 陶丽;刘巍;;《运输法公约草案》中目的港无人提货问题研究[J];法制与社会;2010年06期
2 徐蔚;;目的港无人提货时对承运人的法律救济[J];青岛远洋船员学院学报;2007年02期
3 赵伟;集装箱超期使用费的几个法律问题[J];水运管理;2005年08期
4 刘海燕;赵文燕;;解决我国目的港无人提货问题的法律救济及建议[J];水运管理;2008年05期
5 胡道华;;海运货物提存交付探略[J];中国水运(学术版);2007年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 张志国;目的港无人提货法律问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2002年
2 孙晓宏;目的港无人提货问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2006年
3 张毅斌;关于FOB下托运人法律地位若干问题的研究[D];上海海事大学;2007年
4 严石;国际海上货物运输提货法律性质研究[D];西南政法大学;2008年
5 查瑞锋;目的港无人提货法律问题研究[D];厦门大学;2008年
，本文编号：2384487
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2384487.html
