被精神病人的公民权利保障

发布时间：2017-12-31 08:32

本文关键词：被精神病人的公民权利保障　出处：《湖北大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：近些年,被精神病现象在我国不断发生,已经成为被精神病公民的人权遭受践踏的法律事实；也成为普通公民“谈虎色变”的热点事件；同时更成为学术界关注的法律焦点之一。被精神病使人民生活在人人自危的恐惧之中；使人权被无情的踩在欲望、利益、权力之下；使原本最神圣的医院给成为践踏人民权利的“帮凶”；使法律变成了别有用心之人非法行为合法化的掩饰工具；使政府、法律的威信一次次受到挑战。笔者选择这个题目作为毕业论文的题目,是希望能够起到抛砖引玉的效果,希望被精神病能够在学界受到更广泛的关注,希望国家能够尽快出台相关法律法规保护被精神病公民的合法权益。本文一共分为六个部分。在绪论部分,笔者主要是通过案例引出被精神病这一法律事件。彭宝泉事件、徐林东事件是公权力介入被精神病事件的典型,是权力膨胀滥用的产物。邹宜均事件是现代人在利益的驱使下人性扭曲的产物,使急需解救的现代人的人生观、价值观在利益面前毫无掩饰的暴露出来。喻家声事件使我们认真的思考单位的在公民生活中的地位以及权力问题。铁一般的现实呈现在我们眼前,让我们不得不去思考被精神病,所以第二部分主要讲了三个内容：被精神病的概念和特征、被精神病的原因以及被精神病所侵犯的公民权利。对此三个问题较为详细的阐述,为论文研究的主要内容打下良好的基础,同时也填补被精神病理论的部分空白。笔者通过分析我国现行法律对精神病问题的一些规定,呈现出现行法律的漏洞,是导致被精神病现象的屡屡发生的原因之一。例如,现行法律对强制收治概念的规定不能适应快速发展的社会,与国际脱轨。另外,还有强制收治标准更是模糊不清,强制收治程序混乱等问题。通过研究国际公约及各国关于被精神病公民权利保护的立法,取之精华,去之糟粕,结合我国国情,应用到我国实践中去。例如,强制收治性质的认定、强制收治的认定标准、收治程序以及救济等都给笔者很大的启发,同时也值得我国立法者借鉴。笔者在最后提出了完善我国被精神病的公民权利保障的路径通过分析强制收治的法学标准和医学标准,提炼出适合我国的强制收治标准；在规范强制收治程序上也提出了自己的见解,主要论述了对精神病患者的送治权、患者的知情同意权、出院权,以及强制收治应遵循司法鉴定程序等。同时,笔者指出了对被精神病公民的救济方法---建立监督机制；保障当事人的申诉、起诉的权利；建立合理的赔偿制度。最后,是对相关人员处罚与制裁的研究。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the phenomenon of psychosis has occurred continuously in our country, which has become the legal fact that the human rights of psychotic citizens have been trampled on. It has also become a hot issue for ordinary citizens to "talk about tiger and change their colors"; At the same time, it has become one of the legal focuses of academic attention. Human rights are mercilessly trampled on desire, interest, power; (B) to make the most sacred hospitals "accomplices" in trampling on the rights of the people; The law has become a cover tool for the legalization of illegal acts by those with ulterior motives; So that the government, the credibility of the law has been challenged time and again. The author chose this topic as the title of the graduation thesis, I hope to play a role in attracting the effect of mental illness can be more widely concerned in the academic world. We hope that the state can introduce relevant laws and regulations as soon as possible to protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens suffering from mental illness. This paper is divided into six parts. In the introduction part, the author mainly leads to the legal event of psychosis through cases. Peng Baoquan incident, Xu Lindong incident is a typical case of public power intervention by mental illness. Zou Yi-jun incident is the result of the distortion of human nature driven by the interests of modern people, which makes modern people in urgent need of rescue of their outlook on life. Values in front of the interests of undisguised exposure. Household voice events make us seriously consider the status of the unit in civil life and power. Iron reality in front of our eyes. So we have to think about being mentally ill, so the second part focuses on three parts: the concept and characteristics of psychosis. The causes of mental illness and the civil rights infringed by mental illness. The three questions are elaborated in detail, which lays a good foundation for the main contents of this paper. At the same time, it also fills up some gaps in the theory of mental illness. By analyzing some provisions of the current law on mental illness, the author presents the loopholes of the current law. For example, the current law on compulsory admission concept can not adapt to the rapid development of society, and international derailment. Through the study of international conventions and national legislation on the protection of the rights of citizens with mental illness, the essence is taken and the dross is removed. Combined with the situation of our country, it is applied to the practice of our country. For example, the identification of the nature of compulsory treatment, the standard of compulsory treatment, the procedure of treatment and the relief all give the author great inspiration. At the end of the paper, the author puts forward the way to perfect the civil rights protection of psychosis in our country by analyzing the legal standard and medical standard of compulsory treatment. To extract the compulsory admission standard suitable for our country; At the same time, it mainly discusses the right to be sent to mental patients, the right of informed consent, the right to discharge, and the compulsory treatment should follow the procedure of judicial expertise. At the same time. The author points out that the relief method to the citizens suffering from mental illness-- to establish a supervisory mechanism; Safeguarding the right of the parties to appeal and prosecute; To establish a reasonable compensation system. Finally, the study of the relevant personnel punishment and sanctions.
【学位授予单位】：湖北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D921

【参考文献】