论迁徙自由权在我国的实现模式
发布时间:2018-01-05 10:13
本文关键词:论迁徙自由权在我国的实现模式 出处:《湖北大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
更多相关文章: 迁徙自由权 完全自由 相对自由 制度改革 救济途径
【摘要】:幸福感作为2012年度的热议话题,不同的人有着不同的答案。迁徙自由权作为民主宪政条件下公民不可剥夺的一项基本权利,为公民个人追求幸福创造着条件,是现代社会成员追求幸福生活和实现人生价值的基础和前提。相比西方国家对公民迁徙自由权的保护,这项古老的基本权利的充分实现在当代中国却受到了诸多的限制,以致公民无法真实地享有真正意义上的迁徙自由权。随着市场经济的发展及世界政治经济的融合,人们对权利的要求日益迫切,迁徙自由权的充分实现在我国越来越受到广泛关注。 探讨迁徙自由权在我国的实现模式,建立在分析和研究迁徙自由权的基础理论和我国在不同时期采取的实现模式的基础上。迁徙自由权指任何人在宪法和法律范围内,有权自愿并且自由地变更居住地,迁移到国内任何一个地方,并在迁入地能平等的享有与迁入地居民同等的权利。通过分析新中国成立后迁徙自由权的发展历程得出,迁徙自由权的实现模式表现为完全自由模式和相对自由模式,相对自由模式又细分为严格限制和消极限制。完全自由、严格限制和消极限制这三种模式都有其特定的历史背景和存在的合理性,但是上述模式伴随着我国经济社会的不断发展暴露出诸多的弊端。为保障公民实现真正意义上的迁徙自由权,我国可采取渐进式的路径。在这种路径设计中,我们要遵循三个原则、实施的具体路径、并结合三种救济途径来共同落实迁徙自由权的真正实现。遵循三个原则具体是指自由的原则、平等的原则和适当限制原则。具体路径是在迁徙自由权尚未入宪的现阶段,由各地方政府积极推进户籍制度改革和教育、就业、社会保障等相关制度的改革,为其真正实现提供制度保障;当迁徙自由权具备入宪条件时,恢复其在宪法中的地位,为其真正实现提供根本法保障。三种救济途径包括宪法救济、民法救济和行政法救济。通过这种渐进式路径为公民的迁徙自由权提供制度保障、法律保障和救济保障,以促进我国公民真实地享有,充分地实现迁徙自由权。
[Abstract]:Happiness as a hot topic in 2012, different people have different answers. The right to freedom of movement is an inalienable basic right of citizens under the conditions of democratic constitutionalism. It is the foundation and premise for the members of modern society to pursue the happy life and realize the value of life, compared with the protection of citizens' right to freedom of movement in western countries. The full realization of this ancient basic right in contemporary China has been subject to many restrictions. With the development of market economy and the integration of world politics and economy, people's demand for rights becomes more and more urgent. The full realization of the right to freedom of movement has attracted more and more attention in our country. Explore the realization mode of the right of freedom of movement in our country. On the basis of analyzing and studying the basic theory of the right to freedom of movement and the mode of realization adopted by our country in different periods, the right to freedom of movement refers to anyone within the scope of constitution and law. The right to change one's place of residence voluntarily and freely and to move to any part of the country. And in the relocation area can enjoy the same rights as the residents in the same place. Through the analysis of the development of the right to freedom of movement after the founding of New China. The realization mode of the right to freedom of movement manifests itself in the mode of complete freedom and relative freedom, and the mode of relative freedom is subdivided into strict restriction and negative restriction, and complete freedom. The three models of strict restriction and negative restriction have their specific historical background and rationality of existence. However, with the development of economy and society in our country, the above model has exposed many disadvantages. In order to protect citizens' right to freedom of movement in real sense, our country can take a gradual path. In this path design. We should follow three principles, the implementation of the specific path, and the combination of three relief ways to implement the real realization of the right to freedom of movement, followed by the three principles specifically refers to the principle of freedom. The principle of equality and the principle of appropriate restriction. The specific path is that at the present stage when the right to freedom of movement has not yet entered the Constitution, the local governments actively promote the reform of the household registration system and the relevant systems such as education, employment, social security and so on. To provide the system guarantee for its real realization; When the right to freedom of movement has the condition to enter the constitution, it can restore its status in the constitution, and provide the guarantee of the fundamental law for its true realization. Three kinds of relief ways include constitutional relief. Civil law relief and administrative law relief. Through this progressive path, we can provide institutional, legal and relief guarantees for citizens' right to freedom of movement, so as to promote our citizens' true enjoyment and full realization of their right to freedom of movement.
【学位授予单位】:湖北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D921
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陆学艺;走出“城乡分治 一国两策”的困境[J];读书;2000年05期
2 肖辉;迁徙自由的宪法学分析[J];河北法学;2004年09期
3 尹晓红;社会转型时期公民迁徙权的宪法保障[J];湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2003年02期
4 李铁喜,贺代贵;论迁徙自由及其在中国的适用[J];湖南公安高等专科学校学报;2001年03期
5 张英红,雷晨晖;户籍制度的历史回溯与改革前瞻[J];湖南公安高等专科学校学报;2002年01期
6 岳智明;我国宪法应恢复迁徙自由[J];河南社会科学;1999年04期
7 杨立新;自由权之侵害及其民法救济[J];法学研究;1994年04期
8 谭水阳;;略论毛泽东农业发展思想与新农村建设[J];世纪桥;2007年02期
9 张英红;户籍制度的历史回溯与改革前瞻[J];宁夏社会科学;2002年03期
10 杜承铭;论迁徙自由权[J];武汉大学学报(社会科学版);2001年04期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 王文录;人口城镇化背景下的户籍制度变迁研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
,本文编号:1382646
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xianfalw/1382646.html