中国宪法语境中不宜使用“不成文宪法”——评周永坤教授的相关论述

发布时间：2018-01-06 18:26

本文关键词：中国宪法语境中不宜使用“不成文宪法”——评周永坤教授的相关论述　出处：《法学》2011年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："不成文宪法"概念缘起于英国式的宪法语境,后流转于德、日等国并引起较大争议,由此产生了多种涵义与外延的"不成文宪法"。在有宪法典的国家讨论"不成文宪法"极易引起理论与逻辑上的混乱与困惑,德国、日本等都不例外。宜以"有宪法典的国家"与"无宪法典的国家"代替"成文宪法国家"与"不成文宪法国家"。中国宪法语境中不宜使用"不成文宪法",一方面是因为概念本身的不严谨;另一方面是因为在我国有宪法典存在的前提下,使用"不成文宪法"极易形成逻辑上的无法自恰。此外,我国当前的宪法传统与文化上的缺陷也决定了在我国宪法语境中不宜使用"不成文宪法"的概念。在诸多政治实践背离宪法文本的客观事实面前,寻求"不成文宪法"可能引发对宪法的潜在危险,不得不防。
[Abstract]:The concept of "unwritten Constitution" originated in the context of the British constitution, and then transferred Yu De, Japan and other countries and caused great controversy. The discussion of unwritten Constitution in the countries with constitutional code is easy to cause confusion and confusion in theory and logic, Germany. Japan is no exception. It is advisable to replace the "written constitutional state" and "unwritten constitutional state" with "the country with the constitutional code" and "the country without the constitutional code". It is not appropriate to use the "unwritten constitution" in the context of the Chinese constitution. On the one hand, because the concept itself is not rigorous; On the other hand, because of the existence of constitutional code in China, the use of "unwritten Constitution" is easy to form a logical self-coincidence. In addition. China's current constitutional tradition and cultural defects also determine that the concept of "unwritten Constitution" should not be used in the constitutional context of our country, in the face of many political practices deviating from the text of the objective fact of the Constitution. Seeking an unwritten Constitution may raise potential dangers to the Constitution and has to be prevented.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学;
【分类号】：D911
【正文快照】： 一、应该跳出“不成文宪法”与“成文宪法”套路去年，笔者曾主要出于对《中国宪法中的不成文宪法—理解中国宪法的新视角》①一文的担优而撰写《关于中国宪法渊源的再认识》一文。②今年《法学》第3期刊发了周永坤教授的《不成文宪法研究的几个问题》(以下简称“周文，’)，

【共引文献】