脑死亡立法的宪法学思考
发布时间:2018-06-29 12:18
本文选题:脑死亡立法 + 合宪性 ; 参考:《苏州大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:近些年来,我国有关脑死亡立法的呼声很高,而脑死亡立法的合宪性问题不可回避。脑死亡立法并不侵犯我国宪法隐含保护的生命权,恰恰体现了国家对公民生命权的积极保障义务。传统死亡标准下看似抢救病人的行为在实际上有损公民的人格尊严,脑死亡立法的目的之一正是为了维护我国宪法保障的人格尊严。同时,脑死亡立法亦符合宪法所倡导的“爱人民”、“爱科学”等社会公德的内涵。纵观中外,脑死亡立法已然是大势所趋,它不仅具有宪法上的正当性而且具备实现可行性。当然,,立法的开展必须符合宪法理念,不得超越宪法界限。根据法律保留原则,建议由全国人大进行专项立法,尽快制定《脑死亡法》以示对生命的敬畏。根据比例原则和正当法律程序原则的要求,立法要体现公正性与民主性。同时,《脑死亡法》还需明确死亡判定标准,规定脑死亡的判定主体、宣告程序和相关法律责任,以保证脑死亡判定的准确性。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the voice of brain death legislation in China is very high, but the constitutionality of brain death legislation cannot be avoided. The legislation of brain death does not violate the right to life, which is implicitly protected by the Constitution of our country, but embodies the positive obligation of the state to protect the right to life of citizens. Under the traditional death standard, it seems that the behavior of rescuing the patient is actually harmful to the human dignity of the citizen. One of the purposes of the brain death legislation is to safeguard the human dignity guaranteed by the Constitution of our country. At the same time, the legislation of brain death also accords with the connotation of social morality such as "loving the people" and "loving science" advocated by the Constitution. Throughout China and abroad, brain death legislation has been the trend of the times, it not only has constitutional legitimacy and feasibility. Of course, legislation must be carried out in line with the constitutional concept, not beyond the limits of the Constitution. According to the principle of law reservation, it is suggested that the National people's Congress should enact the brain death Law as soon as possible to show reverence for life. According to the principle of proportionality and due process of law, legislation should embody fairness and democracy. At the same time, in order to ensure the accuracy of the determination of brain death, it is necessary to define the criterion of death, the main body of the judgment, the procedure of declaration and the related legal responsibility in order to ensure the accuracy of the determination of brain death.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D921
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郝银钟,席作立;宪政视角下的比例原则[J];法商研究;2004年06期
2 王广辉;;论宪法未列举权利[J];法商研究;2007年05期
3 翟滨;生命权内容和地位之检讨[J];法学;2003年03期
4 胡玉鸿;;法律的根本目的在于保障人的尊严[J];法治研究;2010年07期
5 陈敏;;公德与私德关系刍议[J];湖北成人教育学院学报;2011年04期
6 陈敏;;公德与宪法的关系刍议[J];湖北成人教育学院学报;2011年06期
7 颜志伟;关于脑死亡的法律研究[J];河北法学;1999年05期
8 邱仁宗;脑死亡的伦理问题[J];华中科技大学学报(社会科学版);2004年02期
9 上官丕亮;;论宪法上的人格尊严[J];江苏社会科学;2008年02期
10 上官丕亮;;论国家对基本权利的双重义务——以生命权为例[J];江海学刊;2008年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 马利民 张晓东;[N];法制日报;2007年
2 徐青松 黄敏;[N];健康报;2007年
3 本报记者 杨秋兰;[N];健康报;2009年
本文编号:2082089
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xianfalw/2082089.html