行政强制措施检察监督新论

发布时间：2018-01-19 05:15

本文关键词： 行政强制措施检察监督监督内容监督标准监督方法　出处：《云南大学学报(法学版)》2016年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：行政强制措施是一种必要的行政行为,但它可能会挤压,甚至侵害公民权利,故有必要对其进行监督。我国目前的理论与实践仅关注对行政的自我监督、司法监督和社会监督,对行政的检察监督几乎还是个新鲜事物。然而,行政自我监督因存在扩张和控制的矛盾对立而往往缺乏动力;司法监督因其被动性与滞后性而常缺乏效率;社会监督因其参与条件与程序的限制等而仍在成长之中。因此,相较而言,行政检察监督就具有了一系列优势。具体到行政强制措施的检察监督上,应以行政强制措施的要件为监督内容,并将行政强制措施类型化为即时强制行为模式和一般强制行为模式。对前者,检察监督的标准主要为形式合法性标准,监督方法主要为检察建议;对后者,检察监督的标准主要应为实质合理性,监督方法主要应为行政公诉。
[Abstract]:Administrative coercive measures is a necessary administrative act, but it may squeeze or even infringe on civil rights, so it is necessary to supervise it. Our current theory and practice only pay attention to the self-supervision of administration. Judicial supervision and social supervision, the procuratorial supervision of administration is almost a new thing. However, administrative self-supervision often lacks motivation because of the contradiction between expansion and control. Judicial supervision often lacks efficiency because of its passivity and lag. Social supervision is still growing because of the restriction of its participation conditions and procedures. Therefore, administrative procuratorial supervision has a series of advantages, specifically on the procuratorial supervision of administrative coercive measures. The elements of administrative coercive measures should be taken as the content of supervision, and the types of administrative coercive measures should be transformed into the immediate compulsory behavior model and the general compulsory behavior mode. For the former, the standard of procuratorial supervision is mainly the standard of formal legality. Supervision methods are mainly procuratorial suggestions; For the latter, the standard of procuratorial supervision should be substantial rationality, and the method of supervision should be administrative public prosecution.
【作者单位】：淮阴师范学院法政学院;苏州大学王健法学院;
【基金】：江苏省2015年度普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目“检察机关介入公益诉讼的模式与制度研究”的部分成果,项目编号:KYLX15_1279
【分类号】：D922.1
【正文快照】： 早期的观念认为行政强制措施就是行政机关在行政管理过程中所作出的行政行为,行政强制措施就是行政管理的代名词。如今,学者们较为一致地认为,行政强制措施是一类具体行政行为。1它有存在的必要,但作为高权行政的典型表现,其存在不仅意味着对公民权利的挤压与侵害可能,也意味

【参考文献】