过程性信息是否公开的司法判断

发布时间：2018-01-19 05:08

本文关键词： 政府信息公开过程性信息司法判断依法行政利益衡量　出处：《甘肃行政学院学报》2015年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：面对我国实践中业已出现的过程性信息是否公开的争议,学界并未达成共识性意见,当前的法规范也未提供问题的解决空间。考察相关司法判决可发现,法院在该问题上曾经长期采取绝对不公开的态度,而最新判决赵正军案则提出了部分不公开的司法判断。着眼于挖掘具有普适意义的司法判断和对未来司法判断的建构,应当着重探讨过程性信息公开司法审查的关键点与疑难点。其中,关键点是将"依法行政"定位为司法审查的依据,明确厘清不公开的例外情形;疑难点是发现适用"依法行政"时所产生的无法消解的利益冲突并借助利益衡量方法从适用场合、适用原则、利益甄别和利益判断等环节展开分析。过程性信息的公开会随着国情社情的沿革,朝着制度化、常规化的方向发展。
[Abstract]:In the face of the dispute whether the process information is open or not, the academic circles have not reached a consensus opinion, and the current legal norms have not provided the space to solve the problem. The investigation of the relevant judicial decisions can be found. The Court has for a long time adopted an absolute closed attitude on this issue. And the latest judgment Zhao Zhengjun case put forward some closed judicial judgment, with a view to excavating the judicial judgment with universal significance and the construction of the future judicial judgment. We should focus on the key points and difficult points of judicial review of open process information. Among them, the key point is to position "administration according to law" as the basis of judicial review and clarify the exception of non-disclosure. The difficult point is to find the insoluble conflict of interest arising from the application of "administration by law" and apply the principle from the applicable situation with the help of the method of interest measurement. Along with the evolution of the social situation of the national conditions, the publicity of the process information will develop towards the direction of institutionalization and regularization.
【作者单位】：上海交通大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目“推进人的城镇化的重点难点问题研究”的阶段成果,项目编号:14AZD025
【分类号】：D922.1
【正文快照】： 一、引言数据革命潮流席卷下的现代社会,本已经纷繁复杂的行政活动中充斥着更为多元的各类信息,这一方面对行政机关如何有效管理海量信息提出了新的挑战,另一方面也刺激着公众获取更多政府信息的潜在意愿。表现在行政法的视野中,除了传统的对于行政决定的结果可依申请公开外,

【参考文献】