我国私主体参与行政任务的行政法规制

发布时间：2018-01-22 08:46

本文关键词： 私主体行政任务法律地位监督路径救济制度　出处：《山东大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在我国私主体参与行政任务的情形广泛存在且不断发展而传统行政法规制乏力的当下,尽快完善行政法对该领域的规制是当务之急。从行政法视角出发,结合我国实际,在借鉴国外私主体参与行政任务执行理论的基础上,分析论证更适合我国法律体系和实践要求的折中主义规制模式,并以此模式为基础,将参与行政任务的私主体身份归为被授权的私主体、被委托的私主体、行政助手和纯粹私主体四种。在界定私主体参与行政任务的范围问题上,主张采用消极排除法,结合我国行政法体系的特点,通过多维度、否定式列举,达到更加细致地界定私主体可参与的行政任务范围的效果。私主体参与行政任务绝对不应流于形式,否则该制度的引入将毫无价值,所以设计程序上和实体上的保障措施是能够保证私主体有效参与的良法。在对私主体参与行政任务的监督制度中,除了政府监督和公民监督以外,还提议设置独立的、权威的监督机构,其中政府监督中提出了量化达标方式,有利于促进监督的简明和高效。私主体参与行政任务的规范虽然欠缺,但是并不能因此对其只重视管制和监督,而放弃对它的保障,因为要想更好地发挥该制度的作用,就必须真正尊重它,所以在私主体参与行政任务过程中引发争议时不仅要保障第三人的权利救济,更要在私主体与行政机关产生纠纷时对私主体权利的救济进行保障,这有利于保护私主体参与行政任务的积极性,也有利于推动政府改进社会管理的方式。根据执行行政任务的私主体法律地位不同,产生争议时对第三人的救济途径也不同,包括行政复议和行政诉讼以及民事法律规范的解决方式;根据执行行政任务的私主体与行政机关的关系不同,产生争议时对私主体的救济方式也不同,包括复核、申诉与民事法律规范的解决途径。
[Abstract]:At a time when the situation of private subjects participating in administrative tasks is widespread and developing and the system of traditional administrative regulations is weak, it is urgent to improve the regulation of administrative law in this field as soon as possible. From the perspective of administrative law. Combined with the reality of our country, on the basis of drawing lessons from foreign private subjects to participate in the implementation of administrative tasks, this paper analyzes and demonstrates the eclectic regulatory model that is more suitable for the legal system and practical requirements of our country, and based on this model. Will participate in the administrative tasks of the private subject status as authorized private subjects, entrusted private subjects, administrative assistants and pure private subjects. In defining the scope of private subjects to participate in administrative tasks. The author advocates to adopt the negative exclusion method, combining the characteristics of the administrative law system of our country, and enumerates the negative form through multiple dimensions. To achieve a more detailed definition of the scope of private subjects can participate in the scope of administrative tasks. Private participation in administrative tasks should not be mere form, otherwise, the introduction of the system will be of no value. Therefore, the design of procedural and substantive safeguards is a good law to ensure the effective participation of private subjects. In the supervision system of private subjects' participation in administrative tasks, in addition to government supervision and citizen supervision. It is also proposed to set up an independent, authoritative supervisory body, in which the government supervision puts forward a quantitative standard, which is conducive to promoting the simplicity and efficiency of supervision. However, it was not possible to give up its safeguards by focusing only on regulation and supervision, since it must be truly respected if the system was to play its role better. Therefore, in the process of private participation in administrative tasks, disputes arise not only to protect the third party's right relief, but also to protect the private subject's right relief when there is a dispute between the private subject and the administrative organ. This helps to protect the initiative of private subjects to participate in administrative tasks, but also to promote the government to improve the way of social management. According to the legal status of private subjects to carry out administrative tasks is different. When disputes arise, the remedies to the third party are also different, including administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation, as well as the settlement of civil legal norms; According to the different relationship between the private subject and the administrative organ, there are different ways of relief to the private subject when disputes arise, including review, appeal and settlement of civil legal norms.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.1

【相似文献】