医疗损害赔偿中的后续治疗费用问题

发布时间：2018-01-22 20:51

本文关键词： 医疗损害后续治疗费用伤残评定赔偿侵权责任法　出处：《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：医疗损害赔偿中后续治疗费用是一个有争议的问题。医疗侵权损害的赔偿可以从损害的事实和法律两个角度出发对后续治疗中的医疗损害进行分析。医疗损害中的后续损害从损害形态来看是一种未来损害,但不同于潜在损害。后续治疗的费用应着重与伤残赔偿金区别,两者存在一定的矛盾和交叉,在实践中应分为三种情况处理。后续治疗费用的赔偿履行与引起纠纷的疾病类型有关,从后续费用在可预期与不可预期时分两种情况讨论,对于诊疗项目的认定坚持循证化为主的原则,对于经医保报销的坚持双重赔偿,经判决一次性赔偿后续治疗费后死亡的,后续治疗费不能作为不当得利返还。应在后续损害的症状固定时,对后续治疗费进行司法鉴定,鉴定之后开始计算一年的短期诉讼时效期间。
[Abstract]:The cost of follow-up treatment in medical damage compensation is a controversial issue. The compensation for medical tort damage can be analyzed from the point of view of the fact and law of the damage. The subsequent damage is a kind of future damage from the point of view of the damage form. But different from the potential damage. The cost of follow-up treatment should focus on the difference between the compensation and disability compensation, and there are some contradictions and crossover between the two. In practice, it should be divided into three situations. The compensation and performance of follow-up treatment costs are related to the types of diseases that cause disputes, and the follow-up costs are discussed in two situations: predictable and unpredictable. For the diagnosis and treatment of the identification of the project adhere to the principle of evidence-based, for the medical insurance reimbursement of the insistence on double compensation, after the decision of one-time compensation for follow-up treatment after the death. The follow-up treatment fee can not be returned as improper enrichment. When the symptoms of the subsequent injury are fixed, the subsequent treatment fee should be judicially authenticated, and the short-term limitation period of one year shall be calculated after the appraisal.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.16

【参考文献】