行政问责法制化主张之反思

发布时间：2018-01-24 19:06

本文关键词： 行政问责法制化问责的本质问责制类型法治　出处：《政治与法律》2017年09期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：行政问责法制化已成为我国当下问责研究中的主流主张。法制化行政问责制是行政问责制的重要组成部分,但不是唯一组成部分。政治问责、官僚等级制问责乃至专业问责等也是行政问责的一部分,但不能法制化或完全法制化。法制问责制具有独特的价值取向、运行逻辑和制度构造。在法治原则的指引下,法制问责以行政机关或其公务员具有法律义务为形式要件,以违反理性法则为实质要件,并以正当程序为运行方式。它具有可操作性与可预期性等特点,同时存在问责适用范围有限、被问责主体有限、问责效率低下等局限。既需要根据法治的逻辑来建构问责制,也需要建构并运用其他行政问责制来补足法制问责制。
[Abstract]:The legalization of administrative accountability has become the mainstream of the current accountability research in China. The legal administrative accountability system is an important part of the administrative accountability system, but not the only component. Political accountability. Bureaucratic hierarchy accountability and even professional accountability are also part of administrative accountability, but can not be legalized or completely legalized. The legal accountability system has a unique value orientation. Under the guidance of the principle of the rule of law, the accountability of the legal system takes the legal obligation of the administrative organ or its civil servants as the formal element and the violation of the law of reason as the essential element. It has the characteristics of maneuverability and predictability. At the same time, the scope of application of accountability is limited, and the subject of accountability is limited. It is necessary not only to construct the accountability system according to the logic of the rule of law, but also to construct and use other administrative accountability systems to complement the legal accountability system.
【作者单位】：大连理工大学法律系;
【基金】：辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目“类型化、本土化视角下行政问责制研究”(项目编号:L14CFX026)的部分成果
【分类号】：D922.1
【正文快照】： 自“非典”以来,行政问责已成为我国公共管理学界、政治学界与行政法学界的重要议题。鉴于我国行政问责面临的诸如标准模糊、程序不当、救济不足与各部门、各地问责制度不协调等问题,不少学者提出了行政问责法制化主张,认为应当按照现代法治的精神来建构体系化、法制化的问责

【相似文献】