侵权精神损害赔偿责任主体研究——基于机动车交通事故精神损害赔偿司法实践的反思

发布时间：2018-02-26 15:39

本文关键词： 机动车交通事故精神损害赔偿侵权责任主体责任免除　出处：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国《侵权责任法》、《道路交通安全法》均明确规定,机动车交通事故致人严重损害的,侵权人应当承担物质及精神损害赔偿责任,且侵权人民事责任的承担不因其已承担刑事或行政责任而免除。然而,程序立法关于不受理对刑事被告人精神损害赔偿诉讼的规定,却将刑事被告人排除于侵权精神损害责任主体之外。侵权精神损害赔偿主体范围的实质性限缩,不仅导致现行法条之间的逻辑冲突,诱发了司法不公,更引发了民众对法律价值取向的认识混乱。推动精神损害赔偿主体制度完善的根本在于民事与刑事、实体与程序立法的融合,而在现行法律框架下,明确刑事被告人的雇主、其他共同侵权人以及保险人独立的精神损害赔偿责任亦不失为实现个案公正的可能选择。
[Abstract]:Both the Tort liability Law and the Road Traffic Safety Law clearly stipulate that if a motor vehicle traffic accident causes serious damage to a person, the infringer shall bear the liability for material and spiritual damages. And the tortfeasor's civil liability shall not be exempted from criminal or administrative liability. However, the provisions of procedural legislation on not accepting proceedings for compensation for mental damage to the criminal defendant, However, the criminal defendant is excluded from the subject of tort mental damage liability. The substantial limitation of the scope of the subject of tort spiritual damage compensation not only leads to the logic conflict between the existing laws and regulations, but also induces the judicial injustice. The basic reason for the improvement of the subject system of mental damage compensation lies in the fusion of civil and criminal, substantive and procedural legislation. Under the current legal framework, the employers of criminal defendants are clearly defined. Other joint infringers as well as the insurer's independent liability for mental damage compensation is also a possible choice to realize the fairness of the case.
【作者单位】：江苏省高级人民法院;
【分类号】：DF522

【相似文献】