均衡性原则的具体化

发布时间：2018-02-26 17:03

本文关键词： 均衡性原则权衡具体化成本收益分析商谈　出处：《法学家》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：均衡性原则在适用时存在主观裁量滥用、客观利益衡量不足和"结果导向性"分析等弊端,有必要推进均衡性原则的具体化。目前具体化均衡性原则的尝试主要可分为两种模式:一种是从权衡者角度出发的数学计算模式;另一种是从当事人角度出发的事实问题商谈模式。均衡性原则的本质为目的必要性分析,其功能在于保障权利不被过度侵害和促进社会整体福利。为了尽可能地消除均衡性判断的非理性,应当以权衡者和当事人为共同视角,构建出均衡性原则具体化的新模式:通过吸收成本收益分析方法,并借助于均衡性判断公式,计算出某个最小损害性手段所促进的公益与所造成的损害的比例值,然后再根据均衡性判断法则,具体权衡该最小损害性手段是否具有均衡性。
[Abstract]:When the principle of equilibrium is applied, there are some disadvantages, such as abuse of subjective discretion, insufficient measurement of objective interests and analysis of "result orientation", etc. It is necessary to push forward the materialization of the principle of equilibrium. At present, the attempt of the principle of materialized equilibrium can be divided into two modes: one is the mathematical calculation model from the perspective of the tradeoff; The other is the discussion mode of factual issues from the perspective of the parties. The essence of the principle of equilibrium is the necessity analysis for the purpose. Its function is to protect rights from excessive infringement and to promote the welfare of society as a whole. In order to eliminate irrationality of balanced judgment as far as possible, we should take the tradeoff and the parties as the common perspective. A new model of materializing the principle of equilibrium is constructed: by analyzing the cost and benefit of absorption, and by means of the balance judgment formula, the proportion value of the public welfare and the damage caused by the least harmful means is calculated. Then, according to the rule of equilibrium, we weigh whether the minimum damage means is balanced or not.
【作者单位】：中央财经大学法学院;
【基金】：中央财经大学青年教师发展基金资助项目“比例原则的精确化研究”(QJJ1622)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D912.1

【相似文献】