法院对医务人员过失判断依据之辨析——以《侵权责任法》施行以来相关判决为主要考察对象

发布时间：2018-03-03 06:22

本文选题：医疗损害责任　切入点：过失　出处：《现代法学》2015年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：法院在判断医务人员过失时对相关依据的适用多有偏差,实践中的结果常常与理论中的预设相左。因此,应妥当适用相关依据:医疗常规和法律、行政法规、规章及其他有关诊疗规范,不得仅以是否与之相符为由全然判定过失,其通用性规定可推定过失,但如行为符合患者利益可予推翻。鉴定意见限于提供法官裁判素材,不能做出过失鉴定。关于医疗水平,应确定与当事医方条件相符的参照对象,并以个案情况确定其行为模式,即斟酌患者情况、诊疗行为的风险、收益、成本、发病概率及损害后果。然后将当事医方的行为与之相比以判定过失。总之,对过失的判断不仅要依据医疗常规、法律规范等通用性规定,更要考察个案的具体情况,没有统一内容的模式可循。
[Abstract]:In judging the negligence of medical personnel, the court often deviates from the application of the relevant basis, and the result in practice is often contrary to the presupposition in theory. Therefore, the relevant basis should be properly applied: medical convention and law, administrative regulations, The rules and other relevant diagnostic and therapeutic norms shall not be solely based on whether or not they are consistent with them. The generality of the fault may be presumed, but if the conduct conforms to the interests of the patient, it may be overturned. The appraisal opinion shall be limited to the provision of material for the judge's decision, No fault determination can be made. With regard to the level of medical treatment, reference objects that are consistent with the medical conditions of the parties concerned should be determined, and their patterns of conduct shall be determined on a case-by-case basis, that is, the risk, benefits, and costs of the patient, the diagnosis and treatment, as appropriate, Incidence probability and damage consequence. Then compare the behavior of the medical party concerned with it to judge the fault. In short, the judgment of fault should not only be based on the general rules of medical practice and legal norms, but also examine the specific circumstances of the case. There is no uniform content model to follow.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院法学研究所;
【分类号】：D923;D922.16

【参考文献】