反恐与隐私权保护的冲突与平衡

发布时间：2018-03-06 11:30

本文选题：反恐措施　切入点：隐私权　出处：《山东大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：恐怖主义犯罪严重威胁国家领土完整和安全、严重危害人权包括人类生命、自由、健康等,国际社会打击恐怖主义犯罪,对其进行防范和采取反恐措施,是为了保护国家利益和公众利益,是必要的。在制定反恐法律、采取反恐措施过程中,有些措施如监听监视、搜查、扣押容易涉及公民隐私权的保护,为了安全需要牺牲一些个人自由、限制公民权利,但国家安全和公民权利自由并不是二元对立的,国家安全是公民权利自由的保障,同时也要避免以反恐为名滥用国家权力侵犯包括隐私权在内的公民权利自由。美国自"911事件"之后制定了较为完备的反恐立法,采取了一系列反恐措施,积累了较多的经验和教训,中国的反恐立法起步较晚,应在反思美国反恐问题的基础上,完善国内反恐法律体系,平衡好反恐与隐私权保护的关系。
[Abstract]:Terrorist crimes pose a serious threat to the territorial integrity and security of States, seriously endanger human rights, including human life, freedom, health, etc. The international community has combated terrorist crimes, taken precautions against them and taken counter-terrorism measures, It is necessary to protect the national interest and the public interest. In the process of formulating anti-terrorism laws and adopting counter-terrorism measures, some measures, such as surveillance, surveillance, search, and seizure, are likely to involve the protection of citizens' right to privacy. For the sake of security, we need to sacrifice some individual freedoms and restrict civil rights. However, national security and civil rights and freedoms are not dualistic. National security is the guarantee of civil rights and freedoms. At the same time, it is also necessary to avoid the abuse of state power in the name of counter-terrorism to infringe on civil rights and freedoms, including the right to privacy. The United States has enacted relatively complete anti-terrorism legislation since the "911 incident," and has taken a series of counter-terrorism measures. We have accumulated more experience and lessons, China's anti-terrorism legislation started relatively late, we should reflect on the United States counter-terrorism issues, improve the domestic counter-terrorism legal system, and balance the relationship between counter-terrorism and privacy protection.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923;D922.14

【相似文献】