农村宅基地上房屋买卖司法实证研究

发布时间：2018-03-11 15:20

本文选题：宅基地　切入点：农村房屋买卖　出处：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：对非本集体成员购买宅基地上房屋之合同的效力认定与无效处理的108份终审判决书整理后发现:既存在无效与有效判决及其理据和无效处理的多样化,又存在无效理据不足、有效与无效判决冲突频现、买卖双方过错比例分配与损失认定悬殊;而且非本集体成员买受取得之宅基地使用权既面临登记困境,又因无期限限制、集体未分享宅基地使用权增值收益,甚为不妥。故,宜在"房地一体"的前提下,调整并统一无效与有效判决及其理据,限定无效处理中买卖双方的过错比例分配和损失认定;要求非本集体成员将买受之宅基地使用权登记为集体建设用地使用权或宅基地使用权的特殊类型,并明确使用期限和使用费交纳。
[Abstract]:After the conclusion of 108 final judgments on the validity and invalidation of the contracts for the purchase of houses on the homestead by non-members of the collective, it is found that there are both invalid and valid judgments and their various justifications and invalid treatment, and that there are insufficient invalid justifications. Conflicts between valid and invalid judgments occur frequently, and there is a great disparity in the proportion of fault distribution and loss determination between the buyers and sellers; moreover, the right to use the homestead acquired by non-members of the collective is faced with both registration difficulties and indefinite restrictions. It is inappropriate for the collective not to share the value-added income of the right to use the homestead. Therefore, it is appropriate to adjust and unify the invalid and effective judgments and their justifications under the premise of "integration of the premises", and to limit the allocation of fault proportion and the determination of loss between the buyer and the seller in the invalid treatment; It is required that the non-members of this group register the right to use the purchased homestead as a special type of the right to use the collective construction land or the right to use the homestead, and to make clear the term of use and the payment of the user fee.
【作者单位】：安徽财经大学法学院;
【分类号】：D922.32;D923.6

【相似文献】