中美警察使用武器裁量权比较研究

发布时间：2018-04-05 07:21

本文选题：警察开枪　切入点：客观合理性　出处：《中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：目前我国法律法规对警察武器使用规制过度、保障稀缺且法律规则过于机械、僵化,理论上的纠结反复导致行政性法令与刑事实体法之间存在衔接障碍,立法的滞后导致目前对警察开枪的规制尺度与警察所遭遇的客观危险不相适应。美国对警察裁量权的治理主要通过外部监督、警察政策的完善和高强度的训练来进行,对警官个人责任追究上保持了一定的宽容,一定的执法豁免权,对警官执法有很强的保障作用。我国应当明确对开枪规制的基础理论,完善法律适用标准,加强程序立法,破除行政性法令与刑事法律的衔接障碍,确立合理的开枪指导规则和评价体系,通过完善公安机关裁量基准和加强训练实现对裁量权的治理。
[Abstract]:At present, the laws and regulations of our country overregulate the use of police weapons, the protection is scarce, and the legal rules are too mechanical and rigid. The theoretical entanglement repeatedly leads to the obstacle of convergence between the administrative decree and the criminal substantive law.The lag of legislation makes the regulation of shooting police out of step with the objective danger encountered by the police.The governance of police discretion in the United States is mainly carried out through external supervision, improvement of police policies and high-intensity training. It has maintained a certain degree of tolerance and immunity from law enforcement in the investigation of individual responsibility of police officers.Police officers have a strong safeguard against law enforcement.Our country should make clear the basic theory of shooting regulation, perfect the applicable standard of law, strengthen the legislation of procedure, break down the obstacle of connection between administrative decree and criminal law, establish reasonable guiding rules and evaluation system of shooting.Through perfecting the standard of discretion of public security organs and strengthening training, the governance of discretion is realized.
【作者单位】：中国人民公安大学;中国人民银行深圳中心支行;
【分类号】：D922.14;D971.2;DD912.1

【相似文献】