当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 行政法论文 >

关于湖南省检察机关刑事赔偿协商的调研报告

发布时间:2018-04-07 00:05

  本文选题:赔偿协商监督 切入点:湖南刑事赔偿协商 出处:《湖南师范大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:刑事赔偿协商是2010年《国家赔偿法》修改后,增设的一项新内容。为赔偿义务机关与赔偿请求人在解决刑事赔偿纠纷过程中,平等的参与协商、自由的表达诉求、自愿达成赔偿协议,提供了沟通平台。对建立完善的刑事赔偿制度、化解社会矛盾,促进社会和谐起到了积极作用。 但是从湖南省检察机关适用刑事赔偿协商的司法实践看,由于国家赔偿法对刑事赔偿协商规定过于抽象,可操作性差,导致全省检察机关运用协商解决刑事赔偿纠纷的案件比例低,有被人为闲置倾向;在制度设计上对赔偿协商缺少监督机制,导致错误运用或滥用协商,损害国家利益、赔偿请求人利益现象突出。在对全省检察机关办理刑事赔偿案件适用协商进行调查的基础上,从检察机关办理赔偿案件这一特定视角出发,以《国家赔偿法》第二十三条为依据,针对立法层面对刑事赔偿协商规定过于简单,协商过程缺少监督机制制约,导致司法实践中各种问题层出不穷的现状,提出将赔偿协商从国家赔偿制度中剥离出来,单独构建刑事赔偿协商制度的设想,用制度来规制协商行为。将监督机制引入刑事赔偿协商,以在检察机关成熟运作的人民监督员制度为依托,让与案件无任何利益关联的人民监督员对协商过程进行监督,保障协商过程公开、透明,协商结果公平、公正,防止赔偿义务机关或复议机关损害国家利益或赔偿请求人利益;明确刑事赔偿协商的原则,对协商行为进行有效规制;对协商过程进行具体设计,指引赔偿义务机关如何开展协商,解决过去协商无章可循的局面,规范赔偿义务机关或复议机关的执法行为。 希望在调研基础上提出的构建刑事赔偿协商制度的设想,能更好发挥刑事赔偿协商的效能,提高检察机关执法水平和执法能力,这也是执法规范化建设的必然要求。
[Abstract]:The negotiation of criminal compensation is a new content after the amendment of the State compensation Law in 2010.It provides a communication platform for the compensation obligation organ and the compensation claimant to participate in the consultation freely express their demands freely reach the compensation agreement voluntarily and provide the communication platform in the process of solving the criminal compensation dispute.It has played a positive role in establishing perfect criminal compensation system, resolving social contradictions and promoting social harmony.However, judging from the judicial practice of the procuratorial organs of Hunan Province in applying the consultation on criminal compensation, because the state compensation law is too abstract for the negotiation of criminal compensation, its operability is poor.As a result of the low proportion of cases in which the procuratorial organs in the province use consultation to resolve criminal compensation disputes, and the tendency to be left idle, the lack of supervision mechanism for compensation consultation in the system design leads to the wrong use or abuse of negotiations, thus harming the interests of the state.The phenomenon of compensation claimant's interests is prominent.On the basis of the investigation of the criminal compensation cases handled by the procuratorial organs in the province, the article 23 of the State compensation Law is taken as the basis from the specific angle of view that the procuratorial organs handle the compensation cases.In view of the fact that the legislative level is too simple for the negotiation of criminal compensation and the lack of supervision mechanism in the consultation process leads to the emergence of various problems in judicial practice, it is proposed that the compensation negotiation be separated from the national compensation system.The tentative idea of constructing the negotiation system of criminal compensation alone is to regulate the negotiation behavior with the system.Introducing the supervision mechanism into the criminal compensation negotiation, relying on the people's Supervisor system, which operates mature in the procuratorial organs, giving up the people's supervisors who have no interest in the case to supervise the consultation process, so as to ensure that the consultation process is open and transparent,The result of negotiation is fair and just, preventing the organ of compensatory obligation or reconsideration from harming the national interest or the interests of the claimant; clarifying the principle of criminal compensation negotiation, effectively regulating the negotiation behavior; designing the consultation process concretely,To guide the compensation obligation organization how to carry out the consultation, to solve the situation that there was no rule to follow in the past negotiation, and to standardize the law enforcement behavior of the compensation obligation organ or the reconsideration organ.It is hoped that the assumption of establishing the consultation system of criminal compensation on the basis of investigation and investigation can bring into play the efficiency of criminal compensation negotiation and improve the law enforcement level and ability of procuratorial organs, which is also the inevitable requirement of the construction of law enforcement standardization.
【学位授予单位】:湖南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.1

【共引文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 应建均;;道路设计建造缺陷致害责任研究[J];四川文理学院学报;2014年01期

2 江勇;秦新举;;权利救济视野下国家赔偿请求时效的实践修正[J];法律适用;2014年06期

3 王卉青;;刑事和解协议的性质与效力论略[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2014年10期

4 程聪;;审判阶段刑事和解法律适用问题探析[J];法制与社会;2014年18期

5 王胜娜;;新刑诉法中当事人和解的公诉案件范围研析[J];法制与社会;2014年21期

6 李喜莲;孙晶;;“秋菊”式诉求的回应——论国家赔偿中赔礼道歉责任的司法适用[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2014年05期

7 许旭东;章宝晓;;现行审判格局下行政民事混合侵权赔偿案件的处理[J];法律适用;2014年12期

8 刘台恩;;浅析国家赔偿法中精神损害赔偿的完善[J];法制与经济;2014年16期

9 李梦莹;;浅析国家精神损害赔偿的求偿权主体[J];河南司法警官职业学院学报;2014年02期

10 李年清;;行政强拆赔偿案件中损害事实的举证责任[J];时代法学;2015年01期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 丁晓华;海峡两岸国家赔偿标准之比较研究[D];华东政法大学;2014年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 王列妮;我国刑事赔偿程序诉讼化探析[D];暨南大学;2013年

2 蔡丽宾;我国刑事和解制度的模式分析[D];厦门大学;2014年

3 马玲;公诉案件刑事和解制度之完善[D];华中师范大学;2014年

4 倪蕾;刑事和解制度的适用问题研究[D];安徽大学;2014年

5 冯翔宇;刑事和解适用的案件范围研究[D];内蒙古大学;2014年

6 黄凯欣;刑事和解研究[D];黑龙江大学;2014年

7 冯灿;损害赔偿对刑罚裁量与执行的影响[D];西南政法大学;2013年

8 李晶晶;试论我国公诉案件中刑事和解的适用范围[D];广东财经大学;2014年

9 马玉;精神损害赔偿的认定问题探究[D];延边大学;2014年

10 万永辰;刑事和解制度的风险与应对[D];辽宁大学;2014年



本文编号:1719495

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1719495.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户9198a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com