确权确地之下的新人地矛盾——兼与于建嵘、贺雪峰教授商榷

发布时间：2018-04-19 20:59

本文选题：确权确地 + 所有权　；参考：《探索与争鸣》2015年09期

【摘要】："确权确地"作为当前农村土地确权登记发证工作的主要方式,在强化对既有农户承包权的保护的同时,也引发了农户争夺承包权、承包权与所有权、承包权与经营权之间的矛盾:否定了集体成员后来者的承包权,无益于无地、少地农户的利益增进,培育了一个"在城地主阶层";压缩了经营者的利益,不利于农地规模经营和农业可持续发展;虚化了农村土地所有权,易引发乡村治理危机。"确权确地"应进行调整并适时跟进配套措施:调整土地承包关系;对农地进行合并、成片整治;推动社会保障和公共服务等制度联动改革,建立农地退出机制;改革农业补贴制度,调控土地租金;鼓励土地股份合作制和土地信托制经营,探索集体所有制新的有效实现形式。"确权确利不确地"更加能够保障集体成员权,有利于推动规模经营和公共事务的建设,能够兼顾公平和效率,对其实施范围不应加以严格限制。
[Abstract]:"True right" as the main way of registration and certification of the current rural land confirmation, while strengthening the protection of the contracted rights of the existing farmers, it also leads to the contradiction between the farmers' contending for the contracting right, the contract right and ownership, the contract right and the management right, which negates the contractual right of the collectives as the later members, and is useless to the landless and less farmers. The benefit enhancement, cultivate a "in the city landlord class"; compressed the interests of the operators, is not conducive to the scale of agricultural land management and sustainable agricultural development; the virtual rural land ownership, easy to lead to rural governance crisis. "True right" should be adjusted and timely follow suit measures: adjustment of land contract relations; land consolidation, tablets To promote the reform of the social security and public service system, to establish the mechanism of agricultural land withdrawal, to reform the agricultural subsidy system, to regulate the land rent, to encourage the land share cooperation system and the land trust management, to explore the new and effective form of collective ownership. The construction of dynamic scale operation and public affairs can give consideration to fairness and efficiency, and the scope of its implementation should not be strictly restricted.

【作者单位】：复旦大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：上海市哲学社会科学规划课题(2008F22001) 复旦大学“985”学科建设项目复旦大学2013年度本科教学研究及教改激励项目(2013JL32)
【分类号】：D422.6;D922.32

【参考文献】