行政不作为的可诉性研究

发布时间：2018-04-19 22:27

本文选题：行政不作为 + 可诉性　；参考：《安徽大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：行政不作为是各国政府在行使行政职能过程中的痼疾,也是行政法学理论和实践中历久弥新的课题。2015年最高人民法院发布了《人民法院关于行政不作为十大案例》,并附有基本案情、裁判结果和典型意义。此外,2016年10月,中国行政法学研究会2016年年会就以"行政法重点问题:行政不作为、市场监督、行政检察监督"为主题,与会的全国行政法学专家、学者进行了广泛而深入的交流探讨,可见其重要性与受到的关注度。但是与行政作为的研究深度相比,行政不作为范围广泛、形态各异,行政不作为研究还存在大量的空白,无论在理论或者实务中,仍然有许多复杂的问题有待研究和解决。关于行政不作为的研究,学者们从不同角度进行了分析和探讨。有学者从利益的角度进行类型化研究,将行政不作为分为侵犯公共利益的不作为与侵犯个人利益的不作为。有学者以教育行政领域为研究对象,对抽象行政行为的行政不作为进行了研究。亦有学者从实证分析的角度,通过研究中国裁判文书网上的行政不作为诉讼裁判文书,分析行政不作为现状并提出应对建议。治理行政不作为有许多角度,其中司法救济无疑将发挥关键作用。本文以2017年《人民法院报》上的一则行政不作为案例为切入点,对行政不作为的司法救济进行研究,分析原告起诉难、行政不作为标准难以界定,通过诉讼途径难以获得救济等行为不作为案件进入司法程序寻求救济难的原因,从多个方面探讨了完善我国行政不作为司法救济的路径。文章首先论述了行政不作为的界定,我国的司法实践现状和行政不作为的判断要件,以及如何完善我国行政不作为的司法救济。但基于上述分析,界定和治理行政不作为违法行为具有特殊的复杂性,仅靠法律标准和法律手段很难彻底解决行政不作为违法的问题,毕竟有大量的涉及行政不作为的问题尚难在现实中通过行政诉讼和行政复议的渠道进行处理。
[Abstract]:Administrative omission is the chronic disease of governments in the process of exercising their administrative functions. In 2015, the Supreme people's Court issued "Ten cases of Administrative omission by the people's Court", with the basic case, the result of the judgment and the typical significance. In addition, in October 2016, the annual meeting of the China Association of Administrative Law (CCAL), on the theme of "key issues of administrative law: administrative omission, market supervision, administrative procuratorial supervision", was attended by national administrative law experts. Scholars have carried out extensive and in-depth communication, which shows its importance and attention. However, compared with the depth of administrative action, administrative omission has a wide range of different forms. There are still a lot of gaps in the study of administrative omission, whether in theory or practice, there are still many complex problems to be studied and solved. Scholars have analyzed and discussed the administrative omission from different angles. From the angle of interest, some scholars have classified the administrative omission into the omission of violating the public interest and the omission of infringing the individual interest. Some scholars have studied the administrative omission of abstract administrative act. From the perspective of empirical analysis, some scholars analyze the current situation of administrative omission and put forward some suggestions by studying the administrative omission documents on the Chinese judgment documents. There are many angles to manage administrative omission, among which judicial remedy will undoubtedly play a key role. Based on a case of administrative omission reported by the people's Court in 2017, this paper studies the judicial remedy of administrative omission, analyzes the plaintiff's difficulty in suing, and the criterion of administrative omission is difficult to define. The reasons why it is difficult to obtain relief through litigation and other behavior omission cases entering the judicial procedure are discussed in this paper, and the way to perfect the judicial remedy of administrative omission in China is discussed from many aspects. The article first discusses the definition of administrative omission, the current situation of judicial practice and the judgment elements of administrative omission, and how to perfect the judicial relief of administrative omission. However, based on the above analysis, defining and managing the illegal acts of administrative omission is of special complexity. It is very difficult to solve the problem of illegal administrative omission by legal standards and legal means alone. After all, a large number of problems involving administrative omission are still difficult to deal with through administrative litigation and administrative reconsideration channels in reality.
【学位授予单位】：安徽大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.1

【参考文献】