生态环境损害赔偿归责宜采过错责任原则

发布时间：2018-04-21 10:22

  本文选题：生态环境损害赔偿责任 + 归责原则　； 参考：《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：无过错责任原则有其特定的价值蕴涵,它的产生使侵权责任法的哲学基础由矫正正义转向矫正正义与分配正义并存。与环境侵权制度相比,生态环境损害赔偿制度在保护法益、环境保护方式、调整范围、请求权基础、权利主体及原被告强弱地位等方面均存在不同特点。生态环境损害赔偿问题本质上是一个公法问题。生态环境损害赔偿责任并不符合无过错责任原则的法理与价值取向。生态环境损害赔偿应采过错责任原则,而不是无过错责任原则。
[Abstract]:The principle of no fault liability has its specific value implication. It produces the philosophical basis of the tort liability law from the corrective justice to the correct and distributive justice. Compared with the environmental tort system, the system of compensation for the damage of the ecological environment is in the protection of legal benefits, the way of environmental protection, the scope of adjustment and adjustment, the basis of the right of request, the subject of rights and the strength of the original defendant. There are different characteristics in the weak status and other aspects. The compensation for ecological environmental damage is essentially a public law problem. The liability for damage to the ecological environment does not conform to the legal principle and value orientation of the principle of no fault liability. The compensation for ecological environmental damage should adopt the principle of fault liability, not the principle of no fault liability.

【作者单位】： 河海大学法学院;
【基金】：河海大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(B17020427)
【分类号】：D922.68
，

本文编号：1782019