行政证据转化为刑事证据问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-21 11:12

本文选题：行政证据 + 刑事证据　；参考：《青岛大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着我国社会经济的发展和社会生活的复杂化,行政执法与刑事司法这两者之间的联系越来越紧密。行政证据向刑事证据转化也成为近年来法学理论和实践中普遍关注的一个热点。对此,学界作了大量的理论研究,这些研究主要集中在行政证据在刑事诉讼中转化和应用的程序性衔接、行政犯罪理论以及行政处罚与刑罚的竞合处理等三类问题。但是,有关行政证据转化为刑事证据过程中涉及的证据理论方面的研究却较为薄弱。在司法实务中,各种不同类型的行政证据能否转化为刑事证据以及如何转化为刑事证据等问题都亟待解决。 2012年3月14日,第十一届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第五次会议通过了《关于修改中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法的决定》,其中增加了“行政机关在行政执法和查办案件过程中收集的物证、书证、视听资料、电子数据等证据材料,在刑事诉讼中可以作为证据使用”的规定。其后颁布的《最高人民法院关于适用中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法的解释》进一步规定行政机关在行政执法和查办案件过程中收集的证据资料,“经法庭查证属实,且收集程序符合有关法律、行政法规规定的,可以作为定案的根据。”《刑事诉讼法修正案》的颁布以及司法解释的出台,首次在立法上确认了行政证据可以向刑事证据转化,使两者之间的衔接有了法律依据。但新的《刑事诉讼法》及司法解释的规定仍然不能满足司法实践的需求,仅就证据转化种类而言,目前的规定仅涉及了实物证据的转化,对于言词证据没有作出列举。行政执法和查办案件中取得言辞证据需不需要转化,如何转化为刑事证据仍然值得商榷。同时,对第52条中的“行政机关”的范畴,法律没有作出明确的规定,这些都需要进一步的厘清。笔者通过对行政证据与刑事证据进行比较,分析了行政证据转化为刑事证据的可行性,研究了二者转化的价值,并系统分析和研究了行政证据转化为刑事证据面临的现实问题和对策。
[Abstract]:With the development of social economy and the complication of social life, the relationship between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice is more and more close. The transformation of administrative evidence to criminal evidence has become a hot spot in the theory and practice of law in recent years. The academic circles have made a lot of theoretical studies, which mainly focus on the procedural connection of the transformation and application of administrative evidence in criminal proceedings, the theory of administrative crime and the competing treatment of administrative punishment and penalty. However, the research on the theory of evidence involved in the process of transforming administrative evidence into criminal evidence is relatively weak. In judicial practice, whether different types of administrative evidence can be transformed into criminal evidence and how to transform them into criminal evidence are urgently needed to be solved. 14 March 2012 At its fifth session, the standing Committee of the Eleventh National people's Congress adopted the decision on the revision of the Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China, which added "the material evidence collected by administrative organs in the course of administrative law enforcement and investigation of cases," Documentary evidence, audio-visual materials, electronic data and other evidential materials may be used as evidence in criminal proceedings. The interpretation of the Supreme people's Court concerning the application of the Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China promulgated subsequently further stipulates that the evidence collected by administrative organs in the course of administrative law enforcement and investigation of cases shall be verified by the court. If the collection procedure is in accordance with the relevant laws and administrative regulations, it can be used as the basis for the final decision. "the promulgation of the Amendment to the Criminal procedure Law and the introduction of the judicial interpretation confirm, for the first time, that administrative evidence can be transformed into criminal evidence. So that the link between the two has a legal basis. However, the new Criminal procedure Law and the provisions of judicial interpretation still can not meet the needs of judicial practice. As far as the types of evidence are concerned, the present provisions only involve the transformation of physical evidence, and there is no enumeration of verbal evidence. Whether it is necessary to transform verbal evidence into criminal evidence in administrative law enforcement and investigation is still open to question. At the same time, the scope of "administrative organs" in Article 52 is not clearly defined by law, which needs further clarification. By comparing administrative evidence with criminal evidence, the author analyzes the feasibility of transforming administrative evidence into criminal evidence, and studies the value of transforming administrative evidence into criminal evidence. The paper also analyzes and studies the practical problems and countermeasures of transforming administrative evidence into criminal evidence.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.1;D925.23

【参考文献】