重大行政决策事项范围的文本研究

发布时间：2018-04-22 04:28

本文选题：行政决策 + 重大行政决策　；参考：《吉林大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：十八届四中全会确定了重大行政决策的程序,之后,理论上和实践中关于重大行政决策的研究都更加重视和广泛。诸如重大行政决策风险评估、重大行政决策听证制度、重大行政决策合法性审查、重大行政决策责任追究等,都成了学者研究的主题。其中,重大行政决策的事项范围是这些课题研究的基础和前提,确定重大行政决策事项范围的重要性可想而知。在实践中,深入推进依法行政、加快法治政府建设,迫切需要健全依法决策机制,制定统一的重大行政决策程序制度,明确重大行政决策事项、主体、权限、程序和责任,集中力量推进重要规划、重大民生、政府重大投资和建设项目等重点领域决策的法治化。以更加科学、刚性的决策制度约束规范决策行为,使决策质量得到提高,决策风险受到控制,及时纠正违法不当决策,使政府公信力和执行力得以增强。当然,确定重大行政决策的范围对于推进我国的法治政府建设,加强依法行政有着重要意义。2015年公布的《法治政府建设实施纲要(2015-2020年)》明确规定,要健全依法决策机制,完善重大行政决策程序制度,明确决策主体和事项范围,这有利于推进行政决策科学化、民主化、法治化。然而,何为重大行政决策?其范围应该怎样划分?全国各地对于何为“重大”都是定性的研究,规定比较笼统,界定不明确。并且,重大行政决策具有明显的时空特点,不同地区以及同一地区在不同时间段,对于“何为重大行政决策事项”有着不同的规定。而且,重大行政决策本身也应该随着时空的不同而有所变化,这样才能更加客观、更加符合实际。本文从实证研究的角度出发,搜集全国各省市县关于重大行政决策范围的规定,归纳总结了重大行政决策事项的特点,给出了关于重大行政决策范围的界定方法和具体事项内容。首先,梳理了全国关于重大行政决策的文件规定,总结归纳了各地关于重大行政决策范围的主要事项内容,并且进行了分类;其次,分析了各地规定的重大行政决策事项的特点,并对特点进行了分类和评析;最后,因为重大行政决策事项具有以上特点,所以,得出结论,从实体上无法在全国范围内得出统一的标准来界定重大行政决策事项。所以,笔者从程序的角度为界定重大行政决策事项提出了建议。
[Abstract]:The fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee established the procedure of the important administrative decision, and then, the research on the important administrative decision was paid more attention and widely in theory and practice. Such as the risk assessment of major administrative decisions, the hearing system of major administrative decisions, the examination of the legitimacy of major administrative decisions, the accountability of major administrative decisions and so on, have all become the subjects of scholars' research. Among them, the scope of major administrative decision is the basis and premise of these topics, and the importance of determining the scope of major administrative decision-making can be imagined. In practice, there is an urgent need to improve the decision-making mechanism according to law, formulate a unified system of major administrative decision-making procedures, and clarify major administrative decision-making matters, subjects, powers, procedures and responsibilities, in order to further promote administration according to law and speed up the construction of a government ruled by law. We will concentrate our efforts on promoting the rule of law in key areas such as major planning, major people's livelihood, and major government investment and construction projects. With more scientific and rigid decision-making system to regulate the decision-making behavior, the quality of decision-making is improved, the decision-making risk is controlled, the illegal and improper decision is corrected in time, and the credibility and execution of the government are strengthened. Of course, determining the scope of major administrative decisions is of great significance in promoting the construction of a government ruled by law in our country and strengthening administration by law. The "outline for the implementation of the Construction of a Government under the Rule of Law" published in 2015 (2015-2020) clearly stipulates that the decision-making mechanism in accordance with the law should be improved. Perfecting the system of major administrative decision-making procedure and clarifying the scope of decision subjects and matters will help to promote the scientific, democratic and legalization of administrative decision-making. But what are major administrative decisions? How should its scope be divided? All over the country for what is "significant" qualitative research, the provisions are more general, the definition is unclear. Moreover, the important administrative decision has the obvious space-time characteristic, the different region and the same area in different time period, has the different stipulation to "what is the important administrative decision matter". Moreover, the important administrative decision itself should change with the change of time and space, so that it can be more objective and realistic. From the perspective of empirical research, this paper collects the regulations on the scope of major administrative decisions in provinces, cities and counties of the country, and summarizes the characteristics of major administrative decision-making matters. This paper gives the definition method and specific items about the scope of major administrative decision. First of all, it combs the national documents on major administrative decisions, summarizes and summarizes the main contents of major administrative decisions in various places, and classifies them; secondly, This paper analyzes the characteristics of the major administrative decision-making matters stipulated in various places, and makes a classification and evaluation of the characteristics. Finally, because the major administrative decision-making matters have the above characteristics, the conclusion is drawn, No unified standards can be drawn from the entity to define major administrative decision-making matters. Therefore, the author from the point of view of the procedure for defining major administrative decision-making issues put forward suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.1

【相似文献】