违规和违法行为责任归咎的身份效应——基于官员、富人与普通人间的比较分析

发布时间：2018-04-23 03:26

本文选题：违规/违法行为 + 责任归咎　；参考：《应用心理学》2017年04期

【摘要】：为探讨违规和违法事件中,旁观者对不同社会身份行为者的责任归咎是否具有一致性,研究要求被试对三组不同身份匹配条件下(官员/普通人、富人/普通人以及官员/富人)的违规和违法行为进行责任归咎,结果发现,无论是对违规行为,还是对违法行为,人们对具有官员身份的行为者的责任归咎最为严苛,对具有富人身份的行为者的责任归咎其次,而对既非官员也非富人的普通人的责任归咎则相对宽容,因而责任归咎中具有明显的身份效应。
[Abstract]:In order to explore whether the onlookers' responsibility for different social identity actors is consistent in violations and offenses, the study asked participants to compare three groups of different identity matching conditions (officials / ordinary people). Accountability for violations and offences committed by the rich / ordinary and the official / rich) turns out to be the most onerous for those who act as officials, whether for violations or for violations of the law. It is relatively tolerant to blame those who have the status of the rich, and to the ordinary people who are neither officials nor rich, so there is obvious identity effect in the blame.
【作者单位】：宁波大学心理学系暨研究所;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(16YJC190026)
【分类号】：D922.14

【相似文献】