论行政法上的附随义务

发布时间：2018-04-25 11:47

本文选题：行政附随义务 + 类型化　；参考：《广西大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：行政附随义务是我国行政法领域相对较新的一项重要课题。起初,附随义务理论来源于德国的学说或判例,我国学者也致力于探究附随义务并取得了一定成效,但也仅限于民事领域上。随着时代变迁与法治社会的进程,附随义务的内涵及适用范围已无法满足现今的理论与司法实践。为了赋予附随义务时代新内容,部分学者也开始研究行政法上的附随义务,即行政附随义务。基于民事附随义务理论,其经历了从私法性质领域慢慢向公法领域发展,并逐步法定化,同时也符合制度移植的相关规律,这也就为行政附随义务的法定化奠定了理论基础。在本文中,论述的行政附随义务指的是狭义上的,而非广义意义上。所谓狭义的行政附随义务仅仅指行政机关的行政附随义务,本文也仅阐述行政机关的行政附随义务。行政附随义务的存在与发展有其正当性与合法性,这主要是取决于比例原则在行政案件中的具体运用与贯彻。通过阅读整理最高人民法院的公报案例与指导性案例过程中,业已存在法官运用行政附随义务的相关理论的案例,这无疑在向我们透漏研究其的重要性与必要性。这同时也预示着行政附随义务逐渐法定化的发展趋势。因而承认行政附随义务的存在对行政法治的影响也是显而易见的,其将对行政职权法定、行政机关的职责、行政法治理念等要求都将有所提升,这无疑有助于更好地保障人民利益与实现行政目的。本文主要从行政附随义务的历史演进与理论、类型的划分、违反法律后果等方面,并结合我国目前的立法与司法现状,探索我国行政附随义务的法定化进程。据此,本文主要分为四个章节:第一章主要介绍行政附随义务的基本理论;第二章主要探讨行政附随义务在实践上的具体类型划分;第三章主要分析违反行政附随义务的法律效果;第四章阐述对行政附随义务法法治化问题提出解决建议。
[Abstract]:Administrative collateral obligation is a relatively new and important subject in the field of administrative law in China. At first, the theory of collateral obligation originated from German doctrine or jurisprudence. Chinese scholars have also devoted themselves to exploring collateral obligations and achieved certain results, but only in the field of civil affairs. With the change of the times and the process of the society ruled by law, the connotation and application scope of collateral obligation can not meet the current theory and judicial practice. In order to endow the era of collateral obligation with new content, some scholars have also begun to study the collateral obligation in administrative law, that is, administrative collateral obligation. Based on the theory of civil collateral obligation, it has experienced a slow development from the field of private law to the field of public law, and gradually legalized, at the same time in line with the relevant laws of institutional transplantation, which also laid a theoretical foundation for the legalization of administrative collateral obligations. In this paper, the administrative collateral obligation refers to the narrow sense, not the broad sense. The so-called narrow sense of the administrative collateral obligation only refers to the administrative collateral obligation of the administrative organ, and this article only expounds the administrative collateral obligation of the administrative organ. The existence and development of administrative collateral obligation has its legitimacy and legitimacy, which mainly depends on the concrete application and implementation of the principle of proportionality in administrative cases. In the course of reading and sorting out the cases in the bulletin and guiding cases of the Supreme people's Court, there are already cases of judges applying the relevant theories of administrative collateral obligations, which is undoubtedly revealing to us the importance and necessity of studying them. At the same time, it also indicates the trend of legalization of administrative collateral obligation. Therefore, it is obvious that the existence of administrative collateral obligation will have an obvious impact on the administrative rule of law, which will raise the requirements of the administrative authority, the responsibility of the administrative organ, the concept of the administrative rule of law, and so on. This is undoubtedly conducive to better protection of the interests of the people and the realization of administrative purposes. This article mainly from the administrative collateral obligation historical evolution and the theory, the type division, the violation legal consequence and so on aspect, and unifies our country present legislation and the judicature present situation, explores our country administrative collateral obligation legalization process. According to this, this paper is divided into four chapters: the first chapter mainly introduces the basic theory of administrative collateral obligation, the second chapter mainly discusses the specific types of administrative collateral obligation in practice. The third chapter mainly analyzes the legal effect of violating the obligation of administrative collateral, and the fourth chapter puts forward some suggestions to solve the problem of the legalization of the law of administrative collateral obligation.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.1

【相似文献】