行政规范性文件备案审查的方法研究

发布时间：2018-05-04 23:23

本文选题：行政规范性文件 + 备案审查　；参考：《湘潭大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着行政事务的增多以及行政权的扩张,大量的行政规范性文件应运而生,同时立法机关和行政机关也对行政规范性文件备案审查愈加重视。对于行政规范性文件备案审查制度来说,现阶段所做的不是继续制定大量的新的各种行政规范性文件来调整日益复杂的社会问题,而应当是用科学地方法论对现行的制度进行反思,构建科学理性地方法论和实践路径,促进行政规范性文件备案审查制度的完善。法学方法论的研究对象是具体的法律实践,也就是适用法律的过程,这在一定程度上也决定了其是沟通实践经验和理论体系的学科。只有坚持法学方法论“从实践中来,到实践中去”,才能更好的根植于行政规范性文件备案审查的实践,才能更加突出法学方法论的实践理性色彩。囿于传统的法律分析方法不能适应行政规范性文件备案审查的实际需要,因此应当对现有的法律分析方法进行分类整合,重新划定厘清。将行政规范性文件备案审查的方法分为以下五大具体方法:文面判断法、目的——手段分析法、法律原则逐一分析法、本质分析法、法益衡量分析法。其中法律原则逐一分析法又可细分为法律不溯及既往原则、法律明确性原则、法律保留原则、正当程序原则、比例原则、平等保护原则六个具体方法。这样就勾勒出了行政规范性文件备案审查总的体系结构。行政规范性文件备案审查的实践既应当是方法论来源的土壤,又应当是检验方法论的标尺。因此,再将这些方法论与山西煤矿整改、院校歧视、兰州市路桥费开征、公立医院收取患者停车费、网约车规制等具体个案结合起来,一一对应,在具体个案中发现行政规范性文件备案审查方法的适用路径以及存在的问题,使行政规范性文件备案审查的实践变得丰富多彩,让行政规范性文件备案审查的实践路径变得更为清晰,从而提升行政规范性文件备案审查方法论的可操作性、可预测性、可控制性,实现对行政规范性文件的规制,最终达到行政规范性文件备案审查管理法制化的要求。
[Abstract]:With the increase of administrative affairs and the expansion of administrative power, a large number of administrative normative documents emerge as the times require. At the same time, legislative organs and administrative organs also pay more and more attention to administrative normative documents. As far as the administrative normative document filing and examination system is concerned, what we are doing at this stage is not to continue to formulate a large number of new administrative normative documents to adjust the increasingly complex social problems. Instead, it should reflect on the current system with scientific methodology, construct scientific and rational methodology and practice path, and promote the perfection of administrative normative document filing and examining system. The research object of legal methodology is specific legal practice, that is, the process of applying law, which to some extent determines that it is a discipline of communicating practical experience and theoretical system. Only by adhering to the methodology of law, "from practice to practice", can it be better rooted in the practice of filing and reviewing administrative normative documents, and can the practice rationality of law methodology be more prominent. Due to the traditional legal analysis method can not meet the actual needs of the administrative normative document record review, so the existing legal analysis methods should be classified and integrated to redefine and clarify. The methods of filing and examining administrative normative documents are divided into the following five specific methods: text judgment method, object-means analysis method, legal principle analysis method, essential analysis method, and law benefit measurement analysis method. The analysis of legal principles can be divided into six specific methods: the principle of non-retroactivity of law, the principle of legal clarity, the principle of legal reservation, the principle of due process, the principle of proportionality and the principle of equal protection. In this way, it outlines the overall system structure of administrative normative document filing and review. The practice of filing and examining administrative normative documents should be not only the soil of methodology, but also the criterion of testing methodology. Therefore, combining these methodologies with the specific cases of coal mine rectification in Shanxi, college discrimination, the introduction of road and bridge fees in Lanzhou, the collection of parking fees by patients in public hospitals, and the regulation of ride-sharing, etc., one by one, In the specific cases, we find the applicable path and existing problems of the method of administrative normative document filing and examination, which makes the practice of administrative normative document record examination become rich and colorful. Let the practice path of administrative normative document record and review become more clear, so as to enhance the feasibility, predictability, controllability of the methodology of administrative normative document record review, and realize the regulation of administrative normative document. Finally meet the administrative normative documents record review management of the requirements of the legal system.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.1

【参考文献】