指标控制与依法行政:双重治理模式的实证研究

发布时间：2018-05-09 04:17

本文选题：地方政府 + 政治交易成本　；参考：《法学家》2017年01期

【摘要】：指标考核与依法行政都是控制地方政府的治理机制,均为我国《宪法》所认可。指标控制重结果而轻过程,依法行政只能规范过程而缺乏激励功能。因此,单独使用任一治理手段,都无法有效解决"两个积极性"问题。两种手段并行使用得当,才是激励约束相容的治理机制,远比单一治理模式更为有效。何者占优取决于政治交易成本。实证分析表明,指标控制与依法行政具有互补关系,但互补性开始降低。因指标治理强化中央权威而弱化法治权威,指标控制与依法行政之间有冲突的可能,故而需要区分依法行政和指标考核的不同功能,设计科学的国家治理体系。
[Abstract]:Index examination and administration by law are the governance mechanism of controlling local government, which are approved by the Constitution of our country. The index control emphasizes the result rather than the process, and the administration according to law can only standardize the process and lacks the incentive function. Therefore, the use of any means of governance alone, can not effectively solve the "two enthusiasm" problem. Proper use of the two methods in parallel is the compatible governance mechanism of incentive and constraint, which is far more effective than the single governance model. What dominates depends on the cost of political transactions. The empirical analysis shows that index control and administration according to law have complementary relations, but the complementarities begin to decrease. Because the index governance strengthens the central authority and weakens the authority of the rule of law, there is the possibility of the conflict between the index control and the administration by law. Therefore, it is necessary to distinguish the different functions of the administration by law and the examination of the index, and to design a scientific national governance system.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学经济法学院;
【基金】：西南财经大学法学院中国经济法治研究中心资助
【分类号】：D922.1

【相似文献】