文物影响评价的法治化路径——解释论和立法论的双线视角

发布时间：2018-05-13 20:55

本文选题：不可移动文物 + 影响评价　；参考：《学术交流》2017年02期

【摘要】：城市发展与城市赖以产生与存在的历史文化密不可分,对城市文物环境的破坏会割裂城市与其历史文化之间的联系,最终阻碍城市的发展。现有的文物保护法律体系存在保护对象未尽周严,行政监督乏力的缺陷。不可移动文物是城市文物环境的组成部分,环境保护是文物保护的重要环节。从解释论的视角出发,合乎环境法基本原理的"环境"概念应包括文物环境,环境影响评价的法律规则亦应适用于不可移动文物保护。从立法论的角度出发,需要从模式选择和程序规则两个方面实现文物影响评价制度的法治化。在模式选择上,相较于独立的文物影响评价机制,文物与环境的综合影响评价是更适合我国的做法。在评价程序上,综合影响评价的主体和评价对象两项规则上应具有不同于单纯环境影响评价的特色。
[Abstract]:Urban development is inseparable from the historical culture on which the city is born and exists. The destruction of the city's cultural relic environment will separate the connection between the city and its historical culture, and ultimately hinder the development of the city. The existing legal system of cultural relic protection has defects of incomplete protection objects and weak administrative supervision. Immovable cultural relic is an integral part of urban cultural relic environment, and environmental protection is an important link of cultural relic protection. From the angle of explanation, the concept of "environment" according to the basic principle of environmental law should include the environment of cultural relics, and the legal rules of environmental impact assessment should also be applied to the protection of immovable cultural relics. From the point of view of legislation, it is necessary to realize the legalization of cultural relic impact assessment system from two aspects: mode selection and procedural rules. Compared with the independent cultural relic impact assessment mechanism, the comprehensive impact assessment of cultural relic and environment is more suitable for our country. In the evaluation procedure, the main body and the object of comprehensive impact assessment should have different characteristics from that of pure environmental impact assessment.
【作者单位】：中央财经大学;北京师范大学珠海分校;
【基金】：中国法学会省部级课题“非国有不可移动文物上的土地发展权实现方式研究”(CLS(2016)C10)
【分类号】：D922.16

【相似文献】