经济诱导措施与行政法的实效性保障——以社会抚养费为分析对象

发布时间：2018-05-22 13:35

本文选题：经济诱导措施 + 实效性保障　；参考：《当代法学》2015年02期

【摘要】：经济诱导措施适用于禁止与放任的中间地带,通过经济手段来影响私人的行为动机,进而促进公益上所希望的目标或抑制公益上不希望的目标。生育行为本身并不违法,但控制人口数量又被国家视为重要公益事项,故计划生育行政成为经济诱导措施的典型适用领域之一。从生育调节的功能出发,将针对超生者征收的社会抚养费定位于作为经济抑制措施的收费,而非行政处罚或填补公共投入的补偿性收费,可在计划生育义务的倡导性、生育的人权性等因素中作出合理的协调。社会抚养费虽不直接侵害生育权,但也应当符合财产权保障的要求,并接受比例原则、正当程序原则的控制。这也是对经济诱导措施的共通要求。应探索一套新的规则规范经济诱导措施,使其与行政处罚、行政强制等传统手段一起,构筑行政法实效性保障的规范体系。
[Abstract]:The economic inducement measures can be used in the middle zone of prohibition and laissez-faire to influence private behavior motivation through economic means, and then promote the desired goal of public welfare or restrain the undesirable goal of public welfare. Fertility behavior itself is not illegal, but the control of population is regarded as an important public welfare matter by the state, so family planning administration has become one of the typical application fields of economic inducement measures. Starting from the function of fertility regulation, the social maintenance collected for the superlivists can be regarded as a charge for economic restraint measures, but not as an administrative penalty or a compensatory charge for filling public input, which can be advocated in the family planning obligation. Make reasonable coordination among factors such as human rights of fertility. Although social alimony does not directly violate reproductive rights, it should meet the requirements of property rights protection and accept the control of the principle of proportionality and due process. This is also a common requirement for economic incentives. We should explore a new set of rules to standardize the economic inducement measures so as to build a normative system for the protection of the effectiveness of administrative law together with the traditional means such as administrative punishment and administrative coercion.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【分类号】：D922.1

【参考文献】