论我国突发事件中的行政征用制度
发布时间:2018-06-03 23:06
本文选题:行政征用 + 突发事件 ; 参考:《兰州大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:行政征用是指行政主体为了公共利益的需要,依法以强制方式有偿取得行政相对人的财产使用权或劳务的一种具体行政行为;突发事件是指突然发生,造成或者可能造成严重社会危害,需要采取应急处置措施予以应对的自然灾害、事故灾难、公共卫生事件和社会安定事件。 本文从四个章节论述了我国突发事件中的行政征用制度,第一章详述了与突发事件行政征用相关的定义和理论基础,为制度建设提供理论支撑;第二章罗列了我国宪法、法律和其他法规对于行政征用的规定,发现我国现有立法的规定多为原则性规定,内容笼统且缺乏可操作性,具体不足包括:缺乏统一立法;程序性规定缺失;认定“公共利益”不明晰;补偿标准不恰当和救济途径不明确五点;第三章则是通过研究大陆法系和英美法系的典型国家在行政征用制度方面的规定,希望对我国的法制建设有借鉴意义;第四章在总结了前三章的理论和法律制度后,从实体法和程序法两个方面对我国突发事件中的行政征用制度提出建议,其中实体法方面包括了:健全法律体系、明确公共利益范围、完善补偿标准、扩大救济途径、加强监督机制,程序法方面则包括了征用的决定程序和实施程序,在有效制约公权力行使的同时,保障公民的合法权益。
[Abstract]:Administrative expropriation refers to a specific administrative act in which the administrative subject acquires the right to use the property or labor services of the administrative counterpart in a compulsory manner in accordance with the law in order to meet the needs of the public interest. Natural disasters, accident disasters, public health events and social stability events that cause or may cause serious social harm and need to be dealt with by emergency measures. This paper discusses the system of administrative expropriation in China from four chapters. The first chapter details the definition and theoretical basis related to the administrative expropriation of unexpected events, which provides theoretical support for the construction of the system; the second chapter lists the constitution of our country. It is found that most of the provisions of the existing legislation in our country are in principle and lack of maneuverability. The specific deficiencies include: lack of uniform legislation; lack of procedural provisions; It is concluded that the "public interest" is not clear, the standard of compensation is not appropriate and the remedies are not clear. The third chapter studies the provisions of the administrative expropriation system in the typical countries of the civil law system and the common law system. The fourth chapter, after summarizing the theory and legal system of the first three chapters, puts forward some suggestions on the system of administrative requisition in China from the aspects of substantive law and procedural law. The substantive law includes: perfecting the legal system, clarifying the scope of the public interest, perfecting the standard of compensation, expanding the way of relief, strengthening the supervision mechanism, and the procedural law including the procedure of determining and implementing requisition. While effectively restricting the exercise of public power, protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 徐忠恕;徐京发;;行政征收征用之公共利益的界定——在现行宪法语境下的思考[J];北华大学学报(社会科学版);2006年03期
2 刘颖;;消防行政征用补偿初探[J];北京政法职业学院学报;2009年03期
3 姜明安;行政补偿制度研究[J];法学杂志;2001年05期
4 刘东辉;项丽君;;论行政征用程序[J];法制与社会;2007年09期
5 党雷;;突发事件应对中的行政征用补偿制度研究[J];法治研究;2010年02期
6 林明华;;公共利益正当实现的模式选择及其设想——以行政征收征用为例[J];广东行政学院学报;2008年01期
7 李伟;;突发公共卫生事件应急机制若干行政法律问题探讨[J];广州大学学报(社会科学版);2006年05期
8 谭苏燕;行政征用补偿制度初探[J];湖南商学院学报;2005年04期
9 姜玉琴;;德国行政征收制度探析[J];决策与信息(财经观察);2008年05期
10 孔杨;;论我国公民权利救济途径的困境与出路——以公民权利与国家权力的冲突为视角[J];九江学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年03期
,本文编号:1974617
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/1974617.html