“春江花园业主委员会诉陆家嘴物业管理有限公司物业管理纠纷案”评析

发布时间：2018-06-18 15:09

本文选题：建筑物区分所有权 + 共有权　；参考：《吉林大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：建筑物区分所有权，是住房商品化、建筑小区化、住宅高层化背景下的权利产物。当一栋建筑物同时拥有多个所有权人，其内部所有权结构的复杂化催生了专有权、共有权和成员权的权利分割。作为建筑物区分所有权的客体，如果说专有部分构成了区分所有建筑物的基础，那么共用部分则是联结各个专有部分的纽带。但区别于专有部分的明确性，供区分所有权人共同使用的共有部分具有复杂性。在司法实践中，涉及建筑物区分所有权共有部分收益产生的法律纠纷甚多，已经成为司法实务中的焦点问题之一。本文以“某业主委员会与某物业公司物业服务合同纠纷”一案为切入点，探讨了建筑物区分所有权共有部分的界定以及共有部分收益分配的基本规则，并就司法实践中引发争议的物业费与共有部分抵销的问题展开了细致的阐释，，最后分析了建筑物区分所有权共有部分纠纷的诉讼主体问题，全文共分为四章：第一章为“案件事实、判决及争点”。本章阐释和分析了司法实践中发生的一起建筑物区分所有权共有部分的纠纷案，总结了围绕共有部分存在的三个关键性争议，即共有部分收益的界定和分配问题、共有部分收益的抵销问题以及业主委员会的诉讼主体资格问题。第二章为“建筑物区分所有权共有部分收益的分配”。本章首先探讨了共有部分的范围，认为应当从两个角度界定：其一，共有部分可分为全体或一部分区分所有权人共同所有与使用，即全部共有和部分共有；其二，共有部分可由法律直接规定，也可以由区分所有权人共同约定，即法定共有和约定共有。然后，本章探讨了共有部分收益的分配，并从业主与物业服务企业之间的收益分配和业主之间的收益分配两个方面展开论述。第三章为“建筑物区分所有权共有部分收益的抵销”。本章首先探讨了抵销权的行使条件，在此基础上，论证了以共有部分收益抵销物业费的合法性。然后，进一步明确该收益部分只能与全体业主的物业费抵销，但不能与个别业主的物业费抵销，除非物业服务合同中约定了物业费与共有部分收益抵销的具体方式。第四章为“建筑物区分所有权共有部分收益纠纷的诉讼主体”。本章详细描述了法律层面、司法解释层面、地方性法规层面关于建筑物区分所有权共有部分收益纠纷诉讼主体的相关规定，并展示了理论界关于该问题的主要观点，最后论证了建筑物区分所有权共有部分收益纠纷的诉讼主体的应然规则。
[Abstract]:The division of ownership of buildings is the product of the rights of housing commercialization, building district and high-rise building. When a building has multiple owners at the same time, the complexity of the ownership structure of a building leads to the exclusive rights, the division of the rights of common ownership and the right to membership. The division constitutes the basis for the distinction of all buildings, and the common part is the bond of the exclusive parts. But it is complex to distinguish the common part of the owner from the exclusive part. In judicial practice, there are many legal disputes arising from the share of the ownership of the building. It has become one of the focal problems in the judicial practice. This paper, taking the case of "a dispute between the owner committee and the property service contract of a property company" as the breakthrough point, discusses the definition of the common part of the building division of ownership and the basic rules of the shared part of the income distribution. The problem of partial offsetting has been explained in detail. At last, we have analyzed the litigation subjects of the disputes of condominium ownership. The full text is divided into four chapters.
The first chapter is "case facts, judgments and disputes". This chapter explains and analyzes the case of a common part of the common ownership of buildings in judicial practice, and summarizes three key disputes around the common part, that is, the definition and distribution of common part of the income, the problem of the offset of common part of the income and the owner. The issue of the qualification of the main body of the Commission.
The second chapter is "the distribution of part of the common income of the building division of ownership". First, this chapter discusses the scope of the common part. It is considered that it should be defined from two angles: first, the common part can be divided into the whole or part of the common ownership and the use of the ownership, that is, all shared and partially shared; and second, the common part can be made by the law. The direct stipulation can also be agreed by the distinguished owner, namely, the common ownership and the agreement. Then, this chapter discusses the distribution of the common part of the income, and discusses the two aspects of the income distribution between the owners and the property service enterprises and the income distribution between the owners.
The third chapter is "the offset of a common part of the income of the ownership of the building." this chapter first discusses the conditions of the exercise of the right of set off. On this basis, it demonstrates the legitimacy of the property cost of a common part of the property. Then, it is further clear that the income part can only be offset by the property fee of all the owners, but not with the property of individual owners. The fee is set off unless the property service contract stipulate the specific way that the property fee is offset by the partial income.
The fourth chapter is "the subject of litigation in which the building distinguishes ownership of a total of income disputes". This chapter describes in detail the legal level, the judicial interpretation level, the local regulation level on the relevant provisions of the subject of a common part of the income dispute litigation of the building division of ownership, and shows the main views of the theoretical circle on the problem, finally, It has proved the proper rules of the litigant of the condominium ownership dispute.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.181

【参考文献】