双重面向之处罚法定原则的困境及其出路——基于法的明确性原则

发布时间：2018-06-19 13:19

  本文选题：处罚法定 + 明确性原则　； 参考：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2017年05期

【摘要】：处罚法定原则要求应受行政处罚行为的构成要件和法律效果由法律明确规定,即"法无明文规定不得处罚"。具有总则性质的《行政处罚法》并未明确提及这一行政处罚的基本原则,而学界通常将第3条的规定视为处罚法定原则的体现。通过制度层面的剖析发现,该条包含两个方面的内容:应受处罚的行为法定和处罚行为法定。前者面向相对人,后者面向行政机关。坚守并贯彻处罚法定原则的关键在于:在遵循法的明确性原则的基础上贯彻要件、效果法定;对于欠缺明确性的规范,纵向上区分不同的种类,横向上针对不同的种类分别建构相应的填补规则。
[Abstract]:The principle of punishment law requires that the constitution and legal effect of administrative punishment should be stipulated by the law, that is, "the law does not expressly stipulate that no punishment may be imposed". The basic principle of administrative punishment is not explicitly mentioned in the Administrative punishment Law, which has the character of general principle, but the provision of Article 3 is usually regarded as the embodiment of the principle of punishment law. Through the analysis of the system, it is found that this article contains two aspects: the punishable behavior and the penalized behavior. The former faces the relative person, the latter faces the administrative organ. The key to stick to and carry out the principle of punishment law lies in: implementing the elements on the basis of following the principle of clarity of law, legal effect; for the lack of clarity of the norm, the vertical distinction between different categories, Horizontally, the corresponding filling rules are constructed for different types.
【作者单位】： 南京师范大学中国法治现代化研究院;
【基金】：中国博士后科学基金第61批面上资助(2017M611847) 南京师范大学哲学社会科学青年科研人才培育基金项目(16QNPY04) 南京师范大学引进人才科研启动项目(184080H202)
【分类号】：D922.1
，

本文编号：2040017