医师多点执业的可行性和相关法律问题探究
发布时间:2018-06-19 14:09
本文选题:医师多点执业 + 非法行医 ; 参考:《南京师范大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:医患关系紧张、看病难、看病贵一直是关乎社会和谐的重要问题。面对医疗人才紧缺、医疗资源分配不均以及现有医疗机构运行机制不合理的种种现状,医师多点执业的伟大构想应运而生。2009年,卫生部明确指出,医师可以在两个以上的医疗机构从事诊疗活动,但不包括医师外出会诊。这标志着医师外出执业从“兼职”、“会诊”、“走穴”到“医师多点执业”正逐步走向透明、合理、规范。但是由于缺乏相关配套的法律机制,使得新规定在现实中的操作如履薄冰、举步维艰,由此涉及到的法律层面的问题更是值得关注。 “医师多点执业的可行性与相关法律问题探究”对此问题的剖析主要从两个方面进行:一方面,通过与“非法行医罪”的比较,明确医师多点执业在法律层次上的可行性,即在法律上肯定了医师多点执业并不构成非法行医罪;一方面,结合相关法律条文的分析对医师多点执业可能遇到的医疗责任的分担提出合理性建议,建议按照医师多点执业的形式进行责任划分而不是遵循传统的医师与医疗机构之间构成何种关系进行划分,并且在行文最后建议增加医师执业风险保险和患者意外伤害保险,降低医疗事故的风险率,防患于未然。
[Abstract]:The relationship between doctors and patients is tense, it is difficult to see a doctor, and the cost of seeing a doctor is always an important issue related to social harmony. In the face of the shortage of medical personnel, the uneven distribution of medical resources and the unreasonable operating mechanism of existing medical institutions, the great concept of multi-point practice of doctors came into being. In 2009, the Ministry of Health clearly pointed out, Doctors may engage in medical activities in more than two medical institutions, but not outside of consultation. This indicates that doctors' outside practice from "part-time", "consultation", "walking points" to "doctors' multi-point practice" is gradually moving towards transparency, reasonableness and standardization. However, due to the lack of relevant supporting legal mechanisms, the new provisions in the reality of the operation of thin ice, difficult, which involves the legal aspects of the problem is even more worthy of attention. The analysis of this problem is mainly carried out from two aspects: on the one hand, through the comparison with the crime of "illegal practice of medicine", it is clear that it is feasible for doctors to practise multi-point medicine at the legal level. On the one hand, combining with the analysis of the relevant legal provisions, the author puts forward reasonable suggestions on the sharing of medical responsibility that doctors may encounter in the practice of multipoint practice. It is suggested that the division of responsibilities should be based on the form of multi-point practice of doctors rather than the relationship between traditional doctors and medical institutions, and at the end of the article, it is recommended to increase medical practice risk insurance and patient accident injury insurance. Reduce the risk of medical malpractice and prevent it.
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D922.16
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 黄培;易利华;;关于医师多点执业的几点思考[J];现代医院管理;2010年04期
2 ;非法行医罪争议问题浅探[J];人民检察;1999年11期
3 邵山;论非法行医罪[J];人民司法;2000年02期
4 张道许;;非法行医案件中行政执法与刑事司法的衔接——兼评最高人民法院有关司法解释[J];行政法学研究;2010年02期
5 刘超;正确认识和处理医生兼职[J];南京医科大学学报(社会科学版);2003年01期
6 李筱永;;医师多点执业的法律风险及其防范机制初探[J];医学与社会;2010年10期
7 刘洋;王磊;;对新医改医师多点执业试点政策的思考[J];中国医院管理;2011年05期
8 罗嵇宁;王跃龙;邓志毅;贝文;李力达;;上海市医师多点执业现状与对策分析[J];中国卫生政策研究;2011年12期
9 章程;苏维;;浅析医生兼职问题[J];中国卫生事业管理;2006年10期
10 陈翰丹;刘婵娟;;论医师多点执业侵权责任制度的完善[J];中国卫生事业管理;2010年12期
,本文编号:2040140
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2040140.html