大部制后食品安全监管时间权限规范的实效及应对——以浙江省杭州市食品小作坊安全监管为对象

发布时间：2018-07-06 14:19

本文选题：大部制 + 食品安全监管　；参考：《北方法学》2017年05期

【摘要】：食品小作坊安全监管,是透视大部制后我国食品安全监管时间权限规范实效状况的一个重要窗口。调查数据显示,我国食品安全监管仍然处于被动执法状态。作为被动执法的另一极,运动执法在目前也很盛行。被动执法和运动执法一左一右,使食品安全监管时间权限规范形同虚设,不能有效控制和约束日常的监管行为,从而破坏了法秩序的安定状态。单就法律而言,被动执法和运动执法屡禁不绝的根源是,食品安全监管时间权限规范本身缺乏计划的圆满性,这意味着监管时间权限规范存在法律漏洞。在形成法治思维的前提下,借鉴德国的风险等级与时间权限相对应的立法经验,抓紧填补食品安全监管时间权限规范的漏洞,同时,积极发挥地方立法的优势,及时出台有关时间权限规范方面的实施意见和办法,是我国食品安全监管走出被动执法和运动执法恶性循环的根本举措。
[Abstract]:The safety supervision of small food workshop is an important window for regulating the actual effect of time limits of food safety supervision in China. Survey data show that China's food safety supervision is still in a passive state of law enforcement. As the other pole of passive law enforcement, sports law enforcement is also very popular at present. The passive law enforcement and the movement law enforcement make the time limit of food safety supervision standard empty, and can not effectively control and restrain the daily supervision behavior, thus destroying the stable state of the law order. As far as the law is concerned, the root of passive enforcement and sports enforcement is that the time limit of food safety supervision lacks the satisfaction of the plan itself, which means that there is a legal loophole in the regulation of time limit. On the premise of forming the thinking of rule by law, we should draw lessons from Germany's legislative experience of corresponding risk levels and time limits to fill the loopholes in the time limits of food safety supervision, and at the same time, actively give full play to the advantages of local legislation. It is a fundamental measure for China's food safety supervision to step out of the vicious circle of passive law enforcement and sports law enforcement.
【作者单位】：浙江工商大学法学院;
【基金】：杭州市哲学社会科学规划课题“大部制下食品安全监管时间权限规范研究”(D13FX02)的终期成果浙江省政法委重点课题“浙江省权力清单制度推行中面临的最大问题及其对策研究”(2015NA02)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D922.16

【相似文献】